The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Practical reference · maintained document

Tesamorelin — reference

Maintainers: buffer_sheet, k.brandl_de, mira.patel Last updated 26 June 2026 Next review due 21 August 2026 496 words · 5 revisions
Sourced from a discussion. This document was promoted out of Ipamorelin selectivity claims and where they came from, in Secretagogues & GH axis. That topic links back here, and corrections raised there flow into this page.

Tesamorelin: ghrh analogue, approximate mass 5135.8 Da, 26–38 min half-life. Identity, evidence base, analytical considerations and limitations.

Scope

A maintained identity and evidence reference for Tesamorelin. It is deliberately narrow: what the molecule is, what has been published about it, and what an analytical report on it can and cannot establish. It contains no dosing recommendations and is not advice about anyone's care.

Where a figure is approximate this page says so. Where something is unknown, it says that instead of filling the gap.

Identity

FieldValue
ClassGHRH analogue
Approximate molecular mass≈ 5135.8 Da
Elimination half-life≈ 26–38 min
Route and scheduleSubcutaneous daily
Regulatory statusLicensed in some jurisdictions for HIV-associated lipodystrophy

Masses quoted here are approximate and are given for orientation when reading an analytical report. For a mass-error calculation, use the exact monoisotopic mass computed from the elemental composition rather than a rounded figure from a reference page, including this one.

What it is

Tesamorelin is the one compound in the secretagogue family with a licensed indication and a registration-quality evidence base, which makes it the natural reference point for the class.

Its indication is narrow and specific: excess visceral adipose tissue in HIV-associated lipodystrophy. Generalising from that population to healthy adults is a substantial extrapolation.

Evidence base

Published studies and programmes most relevant to this compound:

  • Registration programme in HIV-associated lipodystrophy

The daily dosing requirement reflects a very short half-life, and it is a useful reminder that GHRH-axis agents are not weekly drugs.

Individual digests for several of these are maintained separately in this commons and are linked from the evidence category. A digest is a summary with its criticisms attached; it is not a substitute for reading the paper.

Analytical considerations

Reversed-phase HPLC with ultraviolet detection at 214 nm is the usual purity method, and electrospray mass spectrometry the usual identity method. A purity figure is an area percentage at a stated wavelength under a stated gradient, and it is not interchangeable with a content determination.

Three things a purity assay on this compound will not tell you: how much peptide is in the container (that requires a content assay), what the counter-ion is (that requires ion chromatography or NMR), and whether anything is present that does not elute under the method used.

See Reversed-phase HPLC for peptides and LC-MS identity confirmation for the method detail.

Status and legality

Licensed in some jurisdictions for HIV-associated lipodystrophy.

Material sold as research-use-only is not a licensed medicine, whatever it contains and however good its certificate is. That is a statement about regulatory status rather than about quality, and it is true of high-purity material as much as of poor material.

Limitations of this page

This is a reference page maintained by volunteers, reviewed on the date shown, and it will be out of date at some point after that date. It summarises published work rather than reproducing it, and a summary always loses something. Where the summary and the source disagree, the source is right.

If you find an error, the fastest route to fixing it is a topic in doc review naming the sentence and the source. The maintainers named above are notified.

Revision history

2026-06-26a.salcedoReverted an unsourced change and asked the editor to re-apply it with a citation.
2026-02-25PharmNotes_WhitfieldUpdated a dated claim and added the date explicitly, per the maintenance convention.
2025-10-12g.pemberton_ukAdded the worked example that the review thread asked for.
2025-09-04NLoughranSplit an overlong section in two and gave the second a proper heading.
2025-06-16titration_diaryInitial promotion from the source topic. Structure taken from the marked solution.

Every edit to a maintained document records its author and a note explaining the change. An edit without a note may be reverted by any wiki editor under R9, and the revert is logged. Disagreements about content belong on the source topic rather than in the revision history (R10).

Related documents