Tags · Evidence

randomised trial

Randomised controlled trial evidence.

174 topics 62 solved Group: Evidence

174 topics · page 1 of 6

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
What TRIUMPH is designed to answer, and why we should not pre-empt it — does this still hold? Compounds › Retatrutide randomised trial effect size TRIUMPH programme retatrutide Solved Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What TRIUMPH is designed to answer, and why we should not pre-empt it — does this still hold? Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read…	+43	47	5.5k	just now
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Evidence › Journal club journal club randomised trial number needed to treat risk of bias Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016)…	+122	131	5.2k	just now
What TRIUMPH is designed to answer, and why we should not pre-empt it Compounds › Retatrutide retatrutide effect size TRIUMPH programme preprint Solved What TRIUMPH is designed to answer, and why we should not pre-empt it I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in…	+4	8	142	6h
Second pass at: Orforglipron as a non-peptide: what changes when the molecule is small Compounds › Oral incretins PIONEER programme orforglipron randomised trial SOUL trial Second pass at: Orforglipron as a non-peptide: what changes when the molecule is small Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021)…		2	17k	6h
The SOUL trial and oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes Compounds › Oral incretins orforglipron oral semaglutide SOUL trial PIONEER programme Posting this under the heading it deserves: The SOUL trial and oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015). Please read it…		2	7.1k	9h
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand Evidence › Journal club journal club randomised trial number needed to treat risk of bias Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) with STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022)…		3	11k	9h
What a statistical analysis plan adds that the paper does not Evidence › Trials open label discontinuation & dropout randomised trial surrogate endpoints Solved What a statistical analysis plan adds that the paper does not — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I have seen SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) cited in support…		2	6.6k	10h
Second pass at: Reading a trial's population section before its results Evidence › Trials open label intention to treat estimand surrogate endpoints Solved Second pass at: Reading a trial's population section before its results Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in…		4	9.5k	10h
Primary endpoint hierarchies and why order matters — one year on Evidence › Trials surrogate endpoints discontinuation & dropout estimand randomised trial Solved On the subject in the title: Primary endpoint hierarchies and why order matters — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) with SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med ,…	+56	61	37k	11h
Composite endpoints and the component doing the work Evidence › Trials randomised trial surrogate endpoints open label discontinuation & dropout Solved Under review Composite endpoints and the component doing the work Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do…	+3	7	33k	13h
Journal club: STEP 8 and the fairness of the comparator dose — a second dataset Evidence › Journal club risk of bias journal club effect size estimand Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: STEP 8 and the fairness of the comparator dose — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med ,…	+18	22	656	13h
Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints Evidence › Journal club randomised trial journal club effect size risk of bias Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) with SURMOUNT-2 (…	+24	28	17k	15h
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Evidence › Journal club randomised trial risk of bias effect size journal club Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Comparing STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021) with SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med ,…	+70	76	4.8k	15h
Molecular mass of semaglutide and why the figure differs between sources Compounds › Semaglutide SELECT trial effect size semaglutide STEP programme Molecular mass of semaglutide and why the figure differs between sources — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021)…	+101	110	12k	16h
Revisiting: Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry Compounds › Retatrutide retatrutide randomised trial effect size preprint Solved Revisiting: Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med ,…	+10	14	8.4k	16h
What the GIP component of tirzepatide is thought to contribute, and how confident we can be Compounds › Tirzepatide tirzepatide SURPASS programme SURMOUNT programme effect size Solved What the GIP component of tirzepatide is thought to contribute, and how confident we can be I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Comparing STEP 1 ( N Engl…	+16	20	23k	19h
Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere — one year on Compounds › Retatrutide TRIUMPH programme effect size preprint retatrutide Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere — one year on Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it…	+92	97	3.6k	20h
Journal club: the CagriSema phase 2 combination paper Evidence › Journal club randomised trial estimand effect size On the subject in the title: Journal club: the CagriSema phase 2 combination paper Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) cited in support of a claim I do not…		2	329	21h
Why cagrilintide alone is discussed so much less than in combination — does this still hold? Compounds › Cagrilintide & amylin analogues cagrisema randomised trial cagrilintide effect size Solved Under review Why cagrilintide alone is discussed so much less than in combination — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Session topic: SURMOUNT-4…	+27	31	1.2k	22h
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session Evidence › Journal club number needed to treat effect size randomised trial journal club On the subject in the title: Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022). Please read it before posting; the…	+114	125	2.5k	23h
Historical amylin analogues and what happened to them Compounds › Cagrilintide & amylin analogues randomised trial cagrilintide cagrisema effect size Posting this under the heading it deserves: Historical amylin analogues and what happened to them Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in support of a…	+29	36	31k	1d
Subgroup analyses: pre-specified versus discovered Evidence › Trials randomised trial intention to treat surrogate endpoints estimand Subgroup analyses: pre-specified versus discovered — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) and finding the…		2	27k	1d
Semaglutide and gastric emptying — the mechanism behind most of the side-effect profile Compounds › Semaglutide STEP programme type 2 diabetes randomised trial SELECT trial Posting this under the heading it deserves: Semaglutide and gastric emptying — the mechanism behind most of the side-effect profile Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen SCALE ( N Engl J Med…	+115	122	2.6k	1d
What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism Compounds › Cagrilintide & amylin analogues randomised trial cagrilintide cagrisema amylin analogues Solved What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) with SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med…	+83	91	46k	1d
Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal Evidence › Journal club estimand effect size risk of bias journal club Under review On the subject in the title: Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…	+110	122	46k	1d
PIONEER 6 cardiovascular safety, read as a safety trial rather than an efficacy one Compounds › Oral incretins PIONEER programme SOUL trial randomised trial orforglipron Solved PIONEER 6 cardiovascular safety, read as a safety trial rather than an efficacy one — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024). Please…	+25	29	22k	1d
Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question Evidence › Journal club journal club estimand randomised trial Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support…	+120	132	13k	1d
Follow-up: The retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper, read closely Compounds › Retatrutide retatrutide randomised trial preprint effect size The retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper, read closely — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…	+19	23	16k	2d
Why a glucagon receptor agonist in a weight-loss compound is not a contradiction Compounds › Retatrutide retatrutide preprint randomised trial effect size Solved The question in the title: Why a glucagon receptor agonist in a weight-loss compound is not a contradiction I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Comparing LEADER ( N Engl J Med…	+43	47	19k	2d
Semaglutide and alcohol: what is actually documented Compounds › Semaglutide STEP programme randomised trial type 2 diabetes SELECT trial Posting this under the heading it deserves: Semaglutide and alcohol: what is actually documented Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) cited in support of a claim I do…	+14	18	10k	2d

Sponsored PeptideMeter — peptide analytics and supplier verificationPurity analysis and structured supplier verification, published as dated records rather than scores. Referenced throughout our sourcing documentation.View analytics →