Tags · Evidence
preprint
Not yet peer reviewed. Labelled every time.
Related in this group: STEP programme · SURMOUNT programme · SURPASS programme · SELECT trial · FLOW trial · SOUL trial · TRIUMPH programme · PIONEER programme · SUSTAIN programme · LEADER trial · randomised trial · meta-analysis
56 topics · page 1 of 2
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What TRIUMPH is designed to answer, and why we should not pre-empt it
What TRIUMPH is designed to answer, and why we should not pre-empt it I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in…
|
+4 | 8 | 142 | 6h |
|
Revisiting: Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry
Revisiting: Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med ,…
|
+10 | 14 | 8.4k | 16h |
|
Stability of BPC-157 in solution: what has been measured — one year on
On the subject in the title: Stability of BPC-157 in solution: what has been measured — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021) with STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021)…
|
+84 | 98 | 7.8k | 18h |
|
Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere — one year on
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere — one year on Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it…
|
+92 | 97 | 3.6k | 20h |
|
Publication patterns in the BPC-157 literature, examined
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Publication patterns in the BPC-157 literature, examined Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in support of…
|
+40 | 45 | 3.4k | 21h |
|
Retatrutide mass and identity: what a report should show
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Retatrutide mass and identity: what a report should show Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024) with STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021)…
|
+22 | 27 | 872 | 22h |
|
What would change my mind about repair peptides: a specific answer
What would change my mind about repair peptides: a specific answer — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Session topic: SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024). Please…
|
+26 | 30 | 1.1k | 23h |
|
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — does this still hold?
The question in the title: BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I have seen…
|
+6 | 10 | 3.1k | 1d |
|
Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people admit
Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people admit — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) with…
|
+60 | 66 | 16k | 1d |
|
Revisiting: How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work
Revisiting: How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in…
|
+31 | 35 | 7k | 1d |
|
Follow-up: The retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper, read closely
The retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper, read closely — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
|
+19 | 23 | 16k | 2d |
|
Revisiting: Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people admit
Revisiting: Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people admit Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SURPASS-4 ( Lancet ,…
|
+50 | 55 | 7.8k | 2d |
|
Why a glucagon receptor agonist in a weight-loss compound is not a contradiction
The question in the title: Why a glucagon receptor agonist in a weight-loss compound is not a contradiction I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Comparing LEADER ( N Engl J Med…
|
+43 | 47 | 19k | 2d |
|
Coming back to: Why a preprint's supplementary material is often the best part
Why a preprint's supplementary material is often the best part — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Comparing SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) with STEP 4 (…
|
+109 | 116 | 36k | 2d |
|
Analytical identity of BPC-157: a 15-mer with a simple mass — does this still hold?
Analytical identity of BPC-157: a 15-mer with a simple mass — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Session topic: SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J…
|
+28 | 33 | 1.6k | 1mo |
|
Why a glucagon receptor agonist in a weight-loss compound is not a contradiction — one year on
Why a glucagon receptor agonist in a weight-loss compound is not a contradiction — one year on — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I have seen SURPASS-2 (…
|
+3 | 7 | 1k | 2mo |
|
Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere
Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited…
|
+7 | 12 | 7.7k | 2mo |
|
About the Preprints category
Unrefereed work, clearly labelled as such, with the usual caveats stated once and taken seriously. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…
|
+3 | 7 | 14k | 3mo |
|
The "under review" status pill and when a moderator applies it
Posting this under the heading it deserves: The "under review" status pill and when a moderator applies it Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024). Please read it…
|
+96 | 119 | 17k | 3mo |
|
Preprint servers and what screening they do
Preprint servers and what screening they do — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
|
+95 | 106 | 5.6k | 4mo |
|
Oral versus injected administration claims for BPC-157
Oral versus injected administration claims for BPC-157 — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim I do not think…
|
+20 | 24 | 47k | 4mo |
|
Citing a preprint in a maintained document: our rule and its reasoning
On the subject in the title: Citing a preprint in a maintained document: our rule and its reasoning Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) cited in support of a…
|
2 | 467 | 4mo | |
|
Reading a preclinical wound-healing model and its relevance to a human tendon — a second dataset
Reading a preclinical wound-healing model and its relevance to a human tendon — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016)…
|
+64 | 69 | 27k | 4mo |
|
How to read a phase 2 result without treating it as a phase 3 result — what changed since
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How to read a phase 2 result without treating it as a phase 3 result — what changed since Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it…
|
+25 | 35 | 568 | 6mo |
|
Retatrutide's phase 2 heart-rate signal and how to think about it
On the subject in the title: Retatrutide's phase 2 heart-rate signal and how to think about it Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019) cited in support of a claim…
|
+19 | 23 | 20k | 7mo |
|
How to read a phase 2 result without treating it as a phase 3 result
The question in the title: How to read a phase 2 result without treating it as a phase 3 result I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Session topic: FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024).…
|
+36 | 40 | 35k | 7mo |
|
[2026 update] Conference abstracts as evidence: the weakest common citation
Conference abstracts as evidence: the weakest common citation — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) with SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024) and finding…
|
2 | 48k | 7mo | |
|
Tracking a preprint to publication: a worked example
Tracking a preprint to publication: a worked example Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021). Please read it before…
|
+133 | 147 | 15k | 7mo |
|
Follow-up: Retatrutide phase 2 in type 2 diabetes: the Lancet paper
Retatrutide phase 2 in type 2 diabetes: the Lancet paper Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a claim I…
|
+1 | 5 | 31k | 8mo |
|
A preprint whose numbers changed substantially at publication
A preprint whose numbers changed substantially at publication — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023). Please read it before posting;…
|
+90 | 95 | 21k | 9mo |