Topic summary

A request that was declined, and the reasoning — a second dataset

Documentation › Wiki requests maintainership promoted to docs wiki post Closed

This is a generated summary. It shows the 9 most-liked posts from a topic of 99, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.

batchlogTL3Regular4 Aug 2025#1

A request that was declined, and the reasoning — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did.

Process question about how this site works.

I have read the guidelines and the trust-level page and I still have a question about the mechanism rather than the rule. Specifically, I would like to understand the reasoning behind it, because I suspect the reasoning is better than the rule sounds.

Not a complaint. If the answer is "because of a failure mode you have not seen yet", I would like to hear about the failure mode.

34 likes 12mo

SHermansenTL2Member5 Aug 2025#8

Picking up post #5: that is the part I would want checked first.

Format suggestions: if you think a maintained page could be clearer in its presentation (different section structure, different examples, added graphics) suggest the change.

26 likes 12mo

b.dumitruTL2 Moderator6 Aug 2025 · edited#14

n.ramos, post #7: Coming back to post #5, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive. Go to post

Coming back to post #12, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

Two things before anyone answers the substance.

First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.

30 likes in reply to #7 12mo

m.strand_rphTL3Pharmacist7 Aug 2025#19

Correction requests: if you spot an error in a maintained page, note it here with the specific correction. The maintainer will review and update if justified.

31 likes 12mo

dr_okonkwoTL4 Moderator10 Aug 2025#44

Staff post. Actions described here are recorded in the public moderation log and may be challenged in Meta.

Format suggestions: if you think a maintained page could be clearer in its presentation (different section structure, different examples, added graphics) suggest the change.

27 likes 12mo

integrator_draftTL3Regular11 Aug 2025#51

post #50 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Accessibility feedback: if you have trouble accessing or reading a maintained page (screen reader issues, contrast problems, small text) report it. Accessibility matters.

32 likes 12mo

t.steenkampTL2Member12 Aug 2025 · edited#66

post #65 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Cross-referencing: if you notice two pages that should reference each other but do not, suggest the cross-reference.

31 likes 12mo

KTurkingtonTL3Regular14 Aug 2025#85

v.klausen, post #53: Cross-referencing: if you notice two pages that should reference each other but do not, suggest the cross-reference. Go to post

Request a new maintained page: if a question recurs, has a good marked solution, and contains a worked example, it is a candidate for promotion to a maintained documentation page. Post your nomination in this subcategory with a link to the topic.

28 likes in reply to #53 11mo

orbitrap_olaTL3Mass spectrometrist15 Aug 2025#91

Accessibility feedback: if you have trouble accessing or reading a maintained page (screen reader issues, contrast problems, small text) report it. Accessibility matters.

30 likes 11mo

Read the full topic (99 posts)

This topic was referenced in

Splitting an overlong document into twoDocumentation › Wiki requests · 34 replies

This topic was closed 45 days after the last reply. Closing is automatic for quiet topics so that a settled answer does not collect new questions underneath it. If you have a follow-up, open a new topic and link back to this one — that keeps both readable and gives your question its own title.

Suggested topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
Splitting an overlong document into two Documentation › Wiki requests promoted to docs review date wiki post Posting this under the heading it deserves: Splitting an overlong document into two Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in…	+30	34	6.2k	1d
Requesting a translation of an existing page Documentation › Wiki requests wiki post maintainership review date Requesting a translation of an existing page — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the trust-level…	+16	20	7.1k	14mo
Revisiting: A page that has drifted out of date and needs a maintainer Documentation › Wiki requests maintainership promoted to docs wiki post review date Revisiting: A page that has drifted out of date and needs a maintainer Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the…	+112	119	8.8k	5mo
Follow-up: Requesting a page: what makes a good request Documentation › Wiki requests promoted to docs review date maintainership wiki post Solved On the subject in the title: Requesting a page: what makes a good request Working notes rather than a conclusion. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps…	+44	50	64k	13mo
A page that has drifted out of date and needs a maintainer Documentation › Wiki requests promoted to docs maintainership review date Solved On the subject in the title: A page that has drifted out of date and needs a maintainer Working notes rather than a conclusion. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in…	+95	104	1.2k	14mo

Related topics — sharing the tags maintainership, promoted to docs, wiki post

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
Reverting an edit that had no revision note Meta › Wiki maintenance citation check moderation review date maintainership Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reverting an edit that had no revision note Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic…	+17	21	4.5k	12mo
What happens when a maintainer goes quiet Documentation › Doc review wiki post citation check maintainership promoted to docs Solved The question in the title: What happens when a maintainer goes quiet I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The…	+3	7	13k	2.1y
Merging two pages that cover the same ground Documentation › Wiki requests wiki post promoted to docs maintainership Merging two pages that cover the same ground Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in…		2	888	13mo
Follow-up: Request: a per-category review queue Meta › Feature requests translation site feedback wiki post Closed On the subject in the title: Request: a per-category review queue Working notes rather than a conclusion. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps being…		2	14k	4mo
Review: an evidence digest and the citation check that delayed it Documentation › Doc review citation check review date promoted to docs wiki post On the subject in the title: Review: an evidence digest and the citation check that delayed it Working notes rather than a conclusion. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The…	+13	17	15k	2d