Second pass at: Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate
post #7 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Bioelectric impedance analysis: less precise than DXA and strongly affected by hydration state. Not reliable for detecting month-to-month changes. Useful for trend over years if done consistently.
Worth separating two things that post #10 runs together.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
Coming back to post #23, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
Bioelectric impedance analysis: less precise than DXA and strongly affected by hydration state. Not reliable for detecting month-to-month changes. Useful for trend over years if done consistently.
post #38 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
post #45 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
Changes during titration: measuring body composition during active titration is less useful than measuring after dose is stable. Titration causes fluid shifts that confound body composition.
Bioelectric impedance analysis: less precise than DXA and strongly affected by hydration state. Not reliable for detecting month-to-month changes. Useful for trend over years if done consistently.
Read the full topic (69 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Second pass at: Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary taleOutcomes › Body composition · 5 replies
- DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass — the long versionOutcomes › Body composition · 111 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass
Posting this under the heading it deserves: DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass Everything below is what sits behind that. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that…
|
+81 | 85 | 2.7k | 7mo |
|
DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass — what changed since
DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this…
|
2 | 56k | 11mo | |
|
About the Body composition category
DXA, BIA, ultrasound and the precision of each. Lean mass preservation during rapid loss. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
|
5 | 64k | 15mo | |
|
Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a…
|
+96 | 112 | 14k | 23mo |
|
DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass — the long version
On the subject in the title: DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this…
|
+97 | 111 | 22k | 14mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags DXA, lean mass loss, data table
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means…
|
3 | 347 | 24d | |
|
Second pass at: Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules
Second pass at: Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in…
|
+13 | 17 | 1.8k | 16mo |
|
Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree
On the subject in the title: Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will…
|
+78 | 84 | 1.7k | 8mo |
|
Injection volume, overload, and peak distortion — one year on
Injection volume, overload, and peak distortion — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have…
|
+4 | 8 | 1.2k | 4mo |
|
Revisiting: Protein density versus volume when you cannot eat much
Revisiting: Protein density versus volume when you cannot eat much Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a…
|
+97 | 108 | 3.6k | 2d |