Access · Insurance & coverage · continued

[2026 update] Step therapy requirements and how to satisfy them posts 121–123

Access › Insurance & coverage insurance appeals prior authorisation

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

ma.balogunTL2 Moderator14 Jan 2025#121

Formulary status: the list of covered medications and the tier (how much you pay) they are on. Checking the current formulary before going to a clinic appointment saves surprise at the pharmacy.

7 likes 18mo

DOdendaalTL3Regular15 Jan 2025#122

Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.

The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.

17 likes 18mo

s.salgadoTL2 Moderator15 Jan 2025#123

n.cabrera, post #18: Appeals process: unemotional prose, the criterion quoted verbatim, evidence mapped to it point by point, dates, and nothing else. Describing how the decision affected you is understandable but does not move the needle in appeals. Go to post

post #122 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Prior authorisation: pre-approval requirements and how to satisfy them. Most denials cite specific criteria. Understanding the criterion is the first step in satisfying it.

0 likes in reply to #18 18mo

This topic was referenced in

Step therapy requirements and how to satisfy themAccess › Insurance & coverage · 25 replies
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure — the long versionAccess › Insurance & coverage · 136 replies
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — a second datasetAccess › Insurance & coverage · 74 replies

Suggested topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure Access › Insurance & coverage appeals formulary prior authorisation insurance On the subject in the title: An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure Working notes rather than a conclusion. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category expires. As…	+12	16	15k	1d
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — a second dataset Access › Insurance & coverage prior authorisation insurance formulary appeals Posting this under the heading it deserves: Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. A coverage question with the paperwork detail…	+67	74	19k	21h
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require Access › Insurance & coverage prior authorisation formulary appeals insurance Solved On the subject in the title: Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require Working notes rather than a conclusion. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…	+9	13	3.2k	17mo
Peer-to-peer review: what actually happens on the call — one year on Access › Insurance & coverage appeals formulary insurance Peer-to-peer review: what actually happens on the call — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this…	+2	6	41k	5mo
Appeal templates and why they are deliberately unemotional Access › Insurance & coverage formulary insurance prior authorisation appeals Posting this under the heading it deserves: Appeal templates and why they are deliberately unemotional Everything below is what sits behind that. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in…	+25	29	764	7mo

Related topics — sharing the tags insurance, appeals, prior authorisation

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
Coming back to: Telehealth prescribing models in the US Regional › North America telehealth FDA compounding insurance Posting this under the heading it deserves: Telehealth prescribing models in the US Everything below is what sits behind that. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category…	+26	30	17k	17h
Canadian access and provincial variation — one year on Regional › North America FDA compounding insurance Canadian access and provincial variation — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this…	+43	47	964	12mo
Coverage for the indication versus for the drug — a second dataset Access › Insurance & coverage prior authorisation appeals formulary insurance Solved Closed On the subject in the title: Coverage for the indication versus for the drug — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is…	+46	50	41k	16mo
[2026 update] An appeal that failed, and what I would do differently Access › Insurance & coverage prior authorisation insurance formulary Posting this under the heading it deserves: An appeal that failed, and what I would do differently Everything below is what sits behind that. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this…	+152	159	2.5k	13mo
Second opinions: how to seek one without burning the first Clinical › Prescriber conversations telehealth prior authorisation beginner friendly type 2 diabetes Closed Second opinions: how to seek one without burning the first Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I…	+1	5	33k	19mo