Tags · Access
insurance
Coverage decisions and how they are made.
Related in this group: prior authorisation · appeals · formulary · cost per milligram · compounding · shortage · NHS · EMA · FDA · MHRA · personal import · telehealth
32 topics · page 1 of 2
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up: Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…
|
+95 | 100 | 9.1k | 10h |
|
Follow-up: External review after an internal denial
Posting this under the heading it deserves: External review after an internal denial Everything below is what sits behind that. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…
|
+6 | 10 | 12k | 15h |
|
Coming back to: Telehealth prescribing models in the US
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Telehealth prescribing models in the US Everything below is what sits behind that. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category…
|
+26 | 30 | 17k | 17h |
|
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. A coverage question with the paperwork detail…
|
+67 | 74 | 19k | 21h |
|
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure
On the subject in the title: An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure Working notes rather than a conclusion. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category expires. As…
|
+12 | 16 | 15k | 1d |
|
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure — the long version
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that…
|
+113 | 136 | 32k | 1mo |
|
External review after an internal denial
External review after an internal denial Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…
|
2 | 18k | 1mo | |
|
Step therapy requirements and how to satisfy them
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Step therapy requirements and how to satisfy them Everything below is what sits behind that. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is…
|
+21 | 25 | 49k | 2mo |
|
About the Insurance & coverage category
Prior authorisation, appeals, denial letters, and documentation that helps. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a…
|
+2 | 6 | 3.2k | 3mo |
|
Follow-up: State-level differences that actually matter
State-level differences that actually matter — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what determines the…
|
+90 | 96 | 4.1k | 4mo |
|
Peer-to-peer review: what actually happens on the call — one year on
Peer-to-peer review: what actually happens on the call — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this…
|
+2 | 6 | 41k | 5mo |
|
Coverage in the US: a map of the usual obstacles
Coverage in the US: a map of the usual obstacles — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what determines the…
|
+46 | 50 | 7.9k | 5mo |
|
Appeal templates and why they are deliberately unemotional
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Appeal templates and why they are deliberately unemotional Everything below is what sits behind that. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in…
|
+25 | 29 | 764 | 7mo |
|
Documentation that materially improves an appeal's chances
Documentation that materially improves an appeal's chances — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…
|
+93 | 98 | 3.6k | 8mo |
|
Second pass at: Coverage in the US: a map of the usual obstacles
On the subject in the title: Second pass at: Coverage in the US: a map of the usual obstacles Working notes rather than a conclusion. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…
|
4 | 62k | 9mo | |
|
About the North America category
US and Canadian regulation, compounding, and coverage. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a note. If the scope…
|
+3 | 7 | 43k | 9mo |
|
State-level differences that actually matter
On the subject in the title: State-level differences that actually matter Working notes rather than a conclusion. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category expires. As of…
|
+6 | 10 | 56k | 10mo |
|
Revisiting: Reading a denial letter as a specification for your appeal
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Reading a denial letter as a specification for your appeal Everything below is what sits behind that. A coverage question with the paperwork detail…
|
+125 | 138 | 9.4k | 10mo |
|
[2026 update] US compounding rules and how they changed
US compounding rules and how they changed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category expires.…
|
+32 | 37 | 7.4k | 10mo |
|
Appeal templates and why they are deliberately unemotional — one year on
Appeal templates and why they are deliberately unemotional — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because…
|
2 | 4.1k | 11mo | |
|
Reading a denial letter as a specification for your appeal
Reading a denial letter as a specification for your appeal Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that…
|
3 | 30k | 12mo | |
|
An appeal that failed, and what I would do differently
An appeal that failed, and what I would do differently Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is…
|
+4 | 8 | 125 | 12mo |
|
Canadian access and provincial variation — one year on
Canadian access and provincial variation — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this…
|
+43 | 47 | 964 | 12mo |
|
[2026 update] An appeal that failed, and what I would do differently
Posting this under the heading it deserves: An appeal that failed, and what I would do differently Everything below is what sits behind that. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this…
|
+152 | 159 | 2.5k | 13mo |
|
Coverage for the indication versus for the drug
Coverage for the indication versus for the drug — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what determines the…
|
+70 | 79 | 18k | 14mo |
|
Telehealth prescribing models in the US
Telehealth prescribing models in the US Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what determines…
|
+95 | 102 | 6.1k | 14mo |
|
Coverage for the indication versus for the drug — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Coverage for the indication versus for the drug — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is…
|
+46 | 50 | 41k | 16mo |
|
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require
On the subject in the title: Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require Working notes rather than a conclusion. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…
|
+9 | 13 | 3.2k | 17mo |
|
Canadian access and provincial variation
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Canadian access and provincial variation Everything below is what sits behind that. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category…
|
+74 | 80 | 7.7k | 18mo |
|
[2026 update] Step therapy requirements and how to satisfy them
Step therapy requirements and how to satisfy them Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…
|
+111 | 122 | 3.4k | 18mo |