Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely posts 61–70
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Incomplete deprotection: mass higher by the protecting group mass. Usually markedly later eluting. A synthesis artifact from incomplete removal of protecting groups.
I read post #61 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
Deletion sequences (incomplete coupling during synthesis): lower in mass by one residue. Chromatographically they usually elute earlier or later depending on the residue's hydrophobicity. They are the most common impurity in solid-phase synthesis.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
Picking up post #65: that is the part I would want checked first.
Dimer and higher-order multimers: two or more peptide molecules bonded together. They appear at double the mass and higher. They may or may not separate from the monomer on HPLC depending on the method.
Worth separating two things that post #65 runs together.
Disulfide formation: if a peptide contains cysteine, it can form disulfide bonds with itself or with other molecules. Under oxidising conditions multiple species appear. Reducing conditions (like DTT) convert them back.
post #69 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Related substances: compounds chemically related to the target peptide but not the target peptide itself. The standard method separates them and reports them as area percent. How related they can be before they exceed specification is a regulatory question.
This topic was referenced in
- Residual solvents and scavengers: what is looked for — what changed sinceAnalytics › Impurities & related substances · 41 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from
Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate in…
|
+11 | 15 | 825 | 2d |
|
Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces
Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+33 | 37 | 46k | 15mo |
|
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have…
|
+78 | 91 | 1k | 10h |
|
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
2 | 22k | 4mo | |
|
Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. A documentation question rather than an…
|
2 | 61k | 3mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags water content, counter-ion content, forced degradation
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Coming back to: Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan
Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+1 | 5 | 36k | 15mo |
|
Residual solvents and scavengers: what is looked for — what changed since
Residual solvents and scavengers: what is looked for — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+37 | 41 | 7k | 2mo |
|
Racemisation and why it is invisible to a mass measurement
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Racemisation and why it is invisible to a mass measurement Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
|
+120 | 127 | 41k | 1mo |
|
A rising related-substance total over six months: degradation or method drift?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: A rising related-substance total over six months: degradation or method drift? Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+37 | 42 | 37k | 23mo |
|
Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+58 | 63 | 1k | 19mo |