Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — does this still hold?
Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.
Something adjacent that I have been thinking about and that does not belong in any of the technical categories. No question in particular; I am interested in how other people see it.
post #2 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Lurking first: if you want to introduce yourself after lurking a bit, that is fine. You do not have to introduce yourself before your first technical post either.
On the opening post — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
Ongoing: you can post multiple introductions over time. If you return after a long break, reintroducing yourself is fine.
No spam: introductions are not a place to advertise commercial products or services. That is a rules violation.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Introducing myself: pharmacist, sceptic, reluctant participant
Introducing myself: pharmacist, sceptic, reluctant participant Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if…
|
+13 | 17 | 23k | 2mo |
|
[2026 update] Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a…
|
2 | 49k | 4mo | |
|
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
|
+2 | 6 | 10k | 15mo |
|
Introducing myself: pharmacist, sceptic, reluctant participant — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Introducing myself: pharmacist, sceptic, reluctant participant — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule…
|
+101 | 107 | 14k | 4mo |
|
Here for the analytics and not much else — one year on
On the subject in the title: Here for the analytics and not much else — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
|
+6 | 10 | 10k | 19mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Titles that describe the question, not the situation — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Titles that describe the question, not the situation — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Question in the title. Context below, and I…
|
+29 | 33 | 29k | 10mo |
|
What to bring: records that a clinician can actually use
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What to bring: records that a clinician can actually use Asking about a population rather than about a person. The published trials in this class…
|
+15 | 19 | 6.4k | 1d |
|
What happens after your first post: likes, trust levels, and why none of it matters much — what changed since
The question in the title: What happens after your first post: likes, trust levels, and why none of it matters much — what changed since I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I…
|
+105 | 118 | 57k | 9mo |
|
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour — does this still hold?
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Question in the title. Context…
|
+19 | 23 | 40k | 14d |
|
Follow-up: How to disagree with an answer you were given, well
How to disagree with an answer you were given, well I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include…
|
2 | 16k | 30d |