This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
On post #27 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Flag a page that has drifted: if you notice a maintained page has information that is outdated (dates that have passed, regulatory changes, new evidence) post a flag so the maintainers see it.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Correction requests: if you spot an error in a maintained page, note it here with the specific correction. The maintainer will review and update if justified.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A page that has drifted out of date and needs a maintainer
On the subject in the title: A page that has drifted out of date and needs a maintainer Working notes rather than a conclusion. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in…
|
+95 | 104 | 1.2k | 14mo |
|
Requesting a translation of an existing page
Requesting a translation of an existing page — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the trust-level…
|
+16 | 20 | 7.1k | 14mo |
|
About the Wiki requests category
Request a new maintained page, or flag one that has drifted out of date. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a note.…
|
+3 | 7 | 655 | 19mo |
|
Merging two pages that cover the same ground
Merging two pages that cover the same ground Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in…
|
2 | 888 | 13mo | |
|
A request that was declined, and the reasoning — a second dataset
A request that was declined, and the reasoning — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Process question about how this site works. I have read the…
|
+89 | 98 | 31k | 11mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Requesting a page: what makes a good request
Requesting a page: what makes a good request Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in…
|
+65 | 71 | 9.3k | 15mo |
|
About the Feature requests category
Requests for platform and documentation features, with the reasoning that justifies them. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
|
4 | 28k | 9mo | |
|
A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Process question about how this site works. I have…
|
+45 | 50 | 33k | 20mo |
|
Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked? Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question…
|
+20 | 24 | 20k | 15mo |
|
A request that was declined, and the reasoning
On the subject in the title: A request that was declined, and the reasoning Working notes rather than a conclusion. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the trust-level…
|
2 | 33k | 17mo |