Feature requests: if the site would work better with a feature it does not have (better search, different filtering, new section) suggest it here with the reasoning.
22 likes 7mo
Feature requests: if the site would work better with a feature it does not have (better search, different filtering, new section) suggest it here with the reasoning.
Performance: if pages are slow to load, timeouts occur, or the site is unresponsive, that is worth reporting with details (when, which pages, how slow).
Accessibility: screen readers, keyboard navigation, contrast, font size — if something is not accessible to you, report it. Accessibility matters.
Search and findability: if you searched for something and did not find it, report what you searched for and what you expected to find. That helps improve indexing and tagging.
Read the full topic (10 posts)
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up: The topic list is dense — is that deliberate?
The question in the title: The topic list is dense — is that deliberate? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons.…
|
4 | 23k | 12mo | |
|
Tag proliferation and whether we should prune
On the subject in the title: Tag proliferation and whether we should prune Working notes rather than a conclusion. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the trust-level…
|
2 | 11k | 11mo | |
|
Mobile reading experience on long topics
Mobile reading experience on long topics Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in…
|
2 | 14k | 4h | |
|
Why the timeline is on the right and not the left — what changed since
Why the timeline is on the right and not the left — what changed since I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Nominating something for promotion into the…
|
+77 | 81 | 4k | 2d |
|
About the Site feedback category
Bugs, friction, and the parts of the site that do not work the way you expected. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and…
|
4 | 54k | 10mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up: A supplier that answers analytical questions with restated claims
A supplier that answers analytical questions with restated claims — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better than…
|
+74 | 82 | 2.8k | 6mo |
|
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
|
3 | 24k | 9mo | |
|
Lurking for two months before posting: was that the right call?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Lurking for two months before posting: was that the right call? Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the things people…
|
+67 | 71 | 11k | 8mo |
|
[2026 update] Are there stupid questions here? A staff answer, at length
Are there stupid questions here? A staff answer, at length — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to…
|
+36 | 40 | 2.4k | 1mo |
|
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour — does this still hold?
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Question in the title. Context…
|
+19 | 23 | 40k | 14d |