Tags · Status

disputed

Members in good standing disagree, and the disagreement is documented.

52 topics 19 solved Group: Status

Related in this group: solved · open question · needs a source · long read · beginner friendly · worked example · data table

52 topics · page 1 of 2

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
A supplier who responds to a discrepancy with silence — what changed since Sourcing › Red flags mislabelling disputed documentation quality underdosing Wiki A supplier who responds to a discrepancy with silence — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better…	+83	88	21k	6h
Coming back to: A structured critique template this community uses Evidence › Study critique confounding risk of bias disputed observational data Posting this under the heading it deserves: A structured critique template this community uses Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) with SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022)…	+63	69	17k	18h
Comparing documentation quality across the directory, tabulated Sourcing › Vendor reports third-party testing disputed Janoshik Analytical batch & lot numbers Comparing documentation quality across the directory, tabulated — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately…	+7	11	29k	19h
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — a second dataset Evidence › Study critique confounding risk of bias effect size disputed Solved Posting this under the heading it deserves: Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024).…	+28	32	1.3k	1d
Revisiting: The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Sourcing › Vendor reports batch & lot numbers Janoshik Analytical documentation quality third-party testing Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Everything below is what sits behind that. Structured report rather than an…	+100	108	57k	1d
Distinguishing a red flag from an inconvenience — a second dataset Sourcing › Red flags moderation documentation quality disputed On the subject in the title: Distinguishing a red flag from an inconvenience — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better than…	+8	12	9.6k	1d
Follow-up: Patterns that reliably precede a problem, documented Sourcing › Red flags underdosing disputed documentation quality Solved On the subject in the title: Patterns that reliably precede a problem, documented Working notes rather than a conclusion. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better than anywhere else I…		2	70	1d
The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Sourcing › Vendor reports disputed documentation quality batch & lot numbers certificate of analysis Solved On the subject in the title: The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…		4	6.3k	1d
[2026 update] A report I filed that turned out to be wrong, and the correction Sourcing › Vendor reports batch & lot numbers third-party testing documentation quality certificate of analysis On the subject in the title: A report I filed that turned out to be wrong, and the correction Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…	+15	19	18k	2d
Batch numbers that do not match the vial label Sourcing › Red flags mislabelling disputed moderation underdosing Solved Batch numbers that do not match the vial label — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately from product…	+43	48	8.9k	2d
Batch numbers that do not match the vial label — what changed since Sourcing › Red flags underdosing documentation quality disputed moderation Solved On the subject in the title: Batch numbers that do not match the vial label — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better than…	+39	43	14k	1mo
Revisiting: Patterns that reliably precede a problem, documented Sourcing › Red flags underdosing moderation mislabelling documentation quality Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Patterns that reliably precede a problem, documented Everything below is what sits behind that. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually…	+16	20	36k	2mo
Second pass at: What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly Sourcing › Vendor reports Janoshik Analytical documentation quality third-party testing batch & lot numbers Solved Second pass at: What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better…	+94	102	20k	3mo
Coming back to: Measurement error in a self-reported exposure Evidence › Study critique risk of bias observational data effect size disputed Measurement error in a self-reported exposure — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…	+23	27	49k	3mo
Second pass at: Identical chromatograms across two different lots Sourcing › Red flags disputed mislabelling moderation Posting this under the heading it deserves: Second pass at: Identical chromatograms across two different lots Everything below is what sits behind that. A logistics question, since the answers here are…	+81	93	13k	4mo
[2026 update] Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example Evidence › Study critique observational data disputed risk of bias Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a…	+103	116	22k	5mo
Measurement error in a self-reported exposure Evidence › Study critique confounding risk of bias effect size disputed Solved Closed Posting this under the heading it deserves: Measurement error in a self-reported exposure Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021). Please read it before…	+117	129	45k	5mo
Distinguishing a red flag from an inconvenience Sourcing › Red flags mislabelling documentation quality moderation underdosing Solved Distinguishing a red flag from an inconvenience — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately from product…		2	38k	6mo
Follow-up: A supplier that answers analytical questions with restated claims Sourcing › Red flags documentation quality disputed mislabelling moderation A supplier that answers analytical questions with restated claims — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better than…	+74	82	2.8k	6mo
Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome Evidence › Study critique disputed observational data effect size On the subject in the title: Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) with FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) and…	+10	14	11k	7mo
What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly Sourcing › Vendor reports batch & lot numbers disputed documentation quality third-party testing What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a…	+27	31	27k	7mo
Documentation that appears only after payment Sourcing › Red flags documentation quality moderation mislabelling disputed Solved Documentation that appears only after payment Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately from…	+113	124	13k	7mo
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate Evidence › Study critique risk of bias disputed observational data Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it before posting; the…		2	55k	7mo
Pricing far outside the range, in either direction Sourcing › Red flags disputed mislabelling underdosing moderation Solved Posting this under the heading it deserves: Pricing far outside the range, in either direction Everything below is what sits behind that. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…	+3	7	27k	7mo
How the vendor documentation pages are maintained, and by whom — what changed since Sourcing › Vendor reports third-party testing disputed batch & lot numbers Solved Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How the vendor documentation pages are maintained, and by whom — what changed since A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better…	+98	104	3k	8mo
Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect — one year on Evidence › Study critique observational data disputed risk of bias Pinned Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a claim…	+5	9	3.2k	8mo
Criticising the method without criticising the authors — one year on Evidence › Study critique confounding effect size disputed risk of bias Solved Closed On the subject in the title: Criticising the method without criticising the authors — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before posting;…	+16	20	61k	11mo
Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example Evidence › Study critique confounding observational data disputed On the subject in the title: Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) with SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med ,…	+21	25	21k	11mo
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study Evidence › Study critique risk of bias observational data disputed confounding Closed Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…	+29	34	28k	11mo
[2026 update] Comparing documentation quality across the directory, tabulated Sourcing › Vendor reports batch & lot numbers documentation quality disputed certificate of analysis Solved Closed On the subject in the title: Comparing documentation quality across the directory, tabulated Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately…		3	18k	11mo

Sponsored PeptideMeter — peptide analytics and supplier verificationPurity analysis and structured supplier verification, published as dated records rather than scores. Referenced throughout our sourcing documentation.View analytics →