Thyroid function tests during substantial weight change
Picking up post #44: that is the part I would want checked first.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
Fasting state: some lab tests require fasting; others do not. Lipids on a fasting draw differ from lipids on a fed draw. Always note whether the test was fasting when comparing results.
Picking up post #71: that is the part I would want checked first.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
I read post #110 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Reference intervals: constructed to contain the central 95% of a reference population, which means one in twenty healthy people falls outside one by definition. Add biological variation and analytical imprecision and the base rate of a meaningless flag is substantial.
post #127 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
A single value outside interval: usually uninformative on a single draw. What makes a result interesting: a trend across multiple draws, a magnitude well beyond the interval, a pattern that coheres with other values, or symptoms that fit.
Picking up post #141: that is the part I would want checked first.
Biological variation: the person-to-person variation in a biomarker for a healthy person is larger than most people realize. Comparing your result to the reference interval is one thing; comparing your result today to your result from months ago is more sensitive to change.
Read the full topic (150 posts)
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Bloodwork category
Panels, reference intervals, biological variation, and resisting the urge to over-read one result. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…
|
+4 | 8 | 4.4k | 3mo |
|
Micronutrient status when intake falls substantially
On the subject in the title: Micronutrient status when intake falls substantially Working notes rather than a conclusion. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The published trials in this…
|
+26 | 30 | 367 | 11mo |
|
Reference intervals: how they are constructed and why one in twenty flags
Reference intervals: how they are constructed and why one in twenty flags — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I…
|
+104 | 119 | 30k | 1mo |
|
Biological variation versus analytical imprecision — does this still hold?
The question in the title: Biological variation versus analytical imprecision — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Asking about a population rather than…
|
2 | 1.8k | 8mo | |
|
A single out-of-range value on an otherwise normal panel
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A single out-of-range value on an otherwise normal panel Everything below is what sits behind that. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I…
|
+70 | 75 | 20k | 6d |
Related topics — sharing the tags lipase & amylase, HbA1c, liver enzymes
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reference intervals: how they are constructed and why one in twenty flags — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Reference intervals: how they are constructed and why one in twenty flags — does this still hold? General question, not a request for advice about…
|
+18 | 22 | 281 | 2h |
|
Reference intervals: how they are constructed and why one in twenty flags
Reference intervals: how they are constructed and why one in twenty flags — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I…
|
+104 | 119 | 30k | 1mo |
|
A single out-of-range value on an otherwise normal panel
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A single out-of-range value on an otherwise normal panel Everything below is what sits behind that. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I…
|
+70 | 75 | 20k | 6d |
|
Second pass at: Fasting versus non-fasting and which tests care
On the subject in the title: Second pass at: Fasting versus non-fasting and which tests care Working notes rather than a conclusion. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I know the…
|
+20 | 25 | 21k | 3mo |
|
Revisiting: How to bring a laboratory report to an appointment usefully
Revisiting: How to bring a laboratory report to an appointment usefully — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I…
|
+143 | 154 | 1.7k | 21mo |