Intersection · Analytics × gradient method
Analytics topics tagged gradient method
Topics in Analytics carrying the tag gradient method. Mobile-phase composition over time; the single biggest driver of apparent purity differences.
26 topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[2026 update] Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree
Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will…
|
+69 | 76 | 920 | 6h |
|
Follow-up: Comparing two chromatograms from different laboratories, properly
Comparing two chromatograms from different laboratories, properly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+62 | 67 | 12k | 9h |
|
Why 99.2% and 97.8% on the same lot can both be correct
Why 99.2% and 97.8% on the same lot can both be correct I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
|
+16 | 20 | 3.1k | 11h |
|
Shoulders, tangent skims, and defensible integration
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Shoulders, tangent skims, and defensible integration Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+16 | 20 | 11k | 13h |
|
About the HPLC & UHPLC category
Reversed-phase separations, gradients, columns, integration, and reading a chromatogram properly. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…
|
4 | 137 | 18h | |
|
Gradient steepness and apparent purity: a worked comparison — the long version
Gradient steepness and apparent purity: a worked comparison — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I…
|
2 | 32k | 1d | |
|
System suitability injections: if they failed, the run did not happen — the long version
System suitability injections: if they failed, the run did not happen — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an…
|
+2 | 6 | 6.2k | 1d |
|
Revisiting: Theoretical plates: useful number or ritual?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Revisiting: Theoretical plates: useful number or ritual? I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere. A…
|
+16 | 21 | 1.2k | 1d |
|
[2026 update] Why 99.2% and 97.8% on the same lot can both be correct
Why 99.2% and 97.8% on the same lot can both be correct — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
|
+1 | 5 | 719 | 2d |
|
[2026 update] Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments
On the subject in the title: Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+65 | 70 | 1.1k | 16d |
|
Carryover and the ghost peak from last week's standard — what changed since
Carryover and the ghost peak from last week's standard — what changed since Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting the method first, because I know what the…
|
+98 | 114 | 37k | 22d |
|
Resolution and tailing factor: real acceptance criteria
Resolution and tailing factor: real acceptance criteria Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
2 | 15k | 1mo | |
|
Shoulders, tangent skims, and defensible integration — the long version
Shoulders, tangent skims, and defensible integration — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting the method first, because I know what the…
|
+16 | 20 | 27k | 3mo |
|
Injection volume, overload, and peak distortion — one year on
Injection volume, overload, and peak distortion — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have…
|
+4 | 8 | 1.2k | 4mo |
|
Comparing two chromatograms from different laboratories, properly
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Comparing two chromatograms from different laboratories, properly Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means…
|
+35 | 40 | 22k | 7mo |
|
Where the integrator drew the baseline, and how much it moved the number
Where the integrator drew the baseline, and how much it moved the number — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+20 | 24 | 1.6k | 8mo |
|
What a reversed-phase purity number actually is — the long version
What a reversed-phase purity number actually is — the long version I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I would like to understand what this number means…
|
2 | 15k | 8mo | |
|
Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree
On the subject in the title: Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will…
|
+78 | 84 | 1.7k | 8mo |
|
Theoretical plates: useful number or ritual?
Theoretical plates: useful number or ritual? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
2 | 284 | 9mo | |
|
Coming back to: Where the integrator drew the baseline, and how much it moved the number
On the subject in the title: Where the integrator drew the baseline, and how much it moved the number Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+20 | 24 | 2.7k | 10mo |
|
Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide
Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
+39 | 43 | 1.1k | 10mo |
|
System suitability injections: if they failed, the run did not happen
Posting this under the heading it deserves: System suitability injections: if they failed, the run did not happen Everything below is what sits behind that. A documentation question rather than an analytical…
|
+23 | 27 | 6k | 11mo |
|
Reading a chromatogram someone posted without axes
Reading a chromatogram someone posted without axes — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate in front…
|
+47 | 55 | 9.4k | 13mo |
|
Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments — what changed since
Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments — what changed since Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting the method first,…
|
+30 | 34 | 40k | 13mo |
|
Coming back to: Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide
On the subject in the title: Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
2 | 43k | 16mo | |
|
Why I ask for the gradient before I discuss the number
The question in the title: Why I ask for the gradient before I discuss the number I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
|
+35 | 39 | 4.9k | 20mo |