Costed them per mg against three other suppliers on the same GHRP-2 5 mg spec. Competitive on price and clearly ahead on documentation.
Shanghai ERP Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Research compound manufacturer trading as ERP (erpbiotechnology.com), based in Shanghai, China, established 2018. Janoshik-tested and verified by Medutest, PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate; supplies peptides, SARMs, injectable oils and raw materials with certificates of analysis.
Dispatch and warehouses
Stock is held regionally, so an order ships from within the buyer’s own country rather than from the manufacturing site.
- Netherlands (Rotterdam) — European Union, 2-4 days
- Germany (Hamburg) — Germany, Austria, Switzerland, 2-4 days
- United Kingdom (London) — United Kingdom & Ireland, 2-3 days
- United States (California) — United States, 2-4 days
- Canada (Toronto) — Canada, 3-5 days
- Australia (Melbourne) — Australia & New Zealand, 3-5 days
Identity
- Legal name
- Shanghai ERP Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
- Short code
ERP- Also known as
- ERP, ERP Biotech, Shanghai ERP Biotechnology
- Storefront
- erpbiotechnology.com →
- City
- Shanghai
- Region
- Shanghai
- Established
- 2018
- First documented here
- 16 Jan 2025
- Specialty
- General catalogue; a shorter record here than the older houses
- Record state
- Verified, one record disputed
The storefront is linked so a reader can verify a supplier directly. This page does not endorse suppliers, and no supplier has any influence over what appears on it — see the funding disclosure.
Verification record
Independent results submitted by members and recorded with the lot, the date, the method as reported, and the state. 3 verified, 1 disputed, 0 unverified.
| Date | Service | Compound | Lot | Method as reported | Result | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-17 | Janoshik | Tirzepatide 10 mg | ERP-26D-0311 | RP-HPLC, 214 nm | 98.2% area | verified |
| 2025-12-09 | PeptideMeter | Semaglutide 5 mg | ERP-25L-0177 | RP-HPLC, 220 nm | 97.9% area | verified |
| 2025-08-05 | Medutest | BPC-157 10 mg | ERP-25H-0620 | RP-HPLC + LC-MS | 98.5% area; identity confirmed | verified |
| 2025-03-11 | VendorInvestigate | Documentation audit | n/a | Document review across 6 certificates | Specification reported as result on two | disputed |
- 2025-12-09, PeptideMeter: Supplier certificate stated "NLT 98.0%" as the result; independent measurement used here.
- 2025-03-11, VendorInvestigate: Supplier position: the specification is the release criterion. Maintainer position: a certificate should report the measured value. Recorded as disputed on documentation practice, not on product.
Documentation quality
Certificates state a purity figure and a method name but frequently omit gradient and wavelength. Two certificates in the record state a specification ("not less than 98%") in the result column rather than a measured value, which is a meaningful distinction.
Maintainers' assessment
Verified on independent results, with a documented weakness: the certificates sometimes report the specification instead of the measurement. Independent purity results have nonetheless been consistent. Maintainers have asked for measured values and the most recent certificates comply.
Community reviews
26 reviews from members with a record on this site. Aggregate rating 9.7 of 10 across 920 reviews.
Dispatched from their warehouse in the United States rather than from the factory, so the glutathione 600 mg was with me on day 2.
First order, deliberately small, BPC-157 10 mg only. Documentation, transit and a Medutest result at 99.0% all checked out, so the next one will not be small.
Sensible packing, sensible timelines, and a certificate that says what it should. No notes.
Shipped with a stated storage recommendation and a shelf-life figure tied to it, without my asking.
Vial labels printed rather than handwritten, lot and date legible, cap seal intact on every unit.
Third order and it went the same way as the first two. Predictable in the way you want a supplier to be.
Regional stock makes the difference — dispatched within the United Kingdom, day 3, cold pack still hard on arrival.
Fair pricing for the documentation standard, and delivery landed on day 4 as quoted.
Moved here after two bad lots elsewhere. 4 orders in and the PeptideMeter numbers have been flat every single time.
They report purity by RP-HPLC with the wavelength stated and peptide content separately. Two different numbers, correctly separated.
Custom synthesis quote came back with a realistic timeline and they beat it. Purity on delivery matched the signed spec.
Good communication throughout, accurate lead time, and the parcel arrived on day 3.
Everything about the order was routine in the best sense — quoted 3 days, arrived in 2.
Shipped from their warehouse in the United States, arrived day 2, documentation complete.
Ordered on a Monday from their warehouse in Canada and it was here by day 3. That is the whole case for regional stock.
Identity confirmed by mass spec on the certificate, not just an area-percent figure. Both questions answered on one page.
The NAD+ 500 mg arrived on day 4 with the cold pack intact and the seal unbroken. Straightforward, exactly as described.
Same lot documentation as the factory ships, but out of their warehouse in the United States, so it landed on day 4.
Reordered on the strength of the last one and got an identical result. Repeatability is the product.
Reliable on the general catalogue lines. Purity figures cluster tightly and the certificates match the lots.
Solid on the NAD+ 500 mg. Purity where it should be, transit 3 days, paperwork in order.
Every certificate I have from them is lot-specific. Not one batch-level document in 6 orders.
Their warehouse in Canada carries the lines I reorder, so there is no wait on a factory run. Day 2 every time.
Medutest has now seen 5 of their lots through me. Not one has come back outside spec.
Weighed 6 vials from the IGF-1 LR3 1 mg order against label. Every one inside 2% of stated mass. Fill consistency is harder than purity and they have it.
Where ERP sells
Shanghai ERP Biotechnology Co., Ltd. sells from its own storefront. The link below is marked nofollow and sponsored; it is here so the identity facts and the verification records on this page can be checked against what the seller publishes, and for nothing else. This site is paid nothing for it.
Visit ERP at erpbiotechnology.com →
Whatever a storefront claims, the lot on the vial has to match the lot on the certificate. That check is yours and nobody else can do it for you.
Discussed in
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there
On the subject in the title: The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…
|
4 | 6.3k | 1d | |
|
Splitting a vial for two laboratories: how to do it without ruining both
Splitting a vial for two laboratories: how to do it without ruining both — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better…
|
+64 | 70 | 4.4k | 13mo |
|
A supplier who responds to a discrepancy with silence
On the subject in the title: A supplier who responds to a discrepancy with silence Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the maintainers asked…
|
2 | 6.1k | 16mo | |
|
Labelling requirements for research chemicals
Labelling requirements for research chemicals — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the maintainers asked for.…
|
+5 | 9 | 45k | 4mo |
|
Revisiting: Filing a first vendor report: a worked example
On the subject in the title: Revisiting: Filing a first vendor report: a worked example Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the maintainers…
|
2 | 60k | 11mo | |
|
Distinguishing a red flag from an inconvenience — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Distinguishing a red flag from an inconvenience — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better than…
|
+8 | 12 | 9.6k | 1d |
Maintenance
Maintainers: KLindqvist. Next review due 28 September 2026.
To add a record, file a structured report in vendor reports with the compound, lot, service, method and result. Reports missing any of those are moved to the discussion rather than the record. Allegations without documentation are hidden under R6 and the hiding is logged.
On what each service's report establishes: Janoshik Analytical · PeptideMeter · Medutest · VendorInvestigate