Topic summary

A 40-week log with the measurement method stated

Outcomes › Progress reports DXA long read data table

This is a generated summary. It shows the 9 most-liked posts from a topic of 98, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.

r.vukovicTL2 Moderator13 Oct 2025#7

post #6 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Seasonal patterns: some people report weight loss is slower in winter than summer. Body composition and activity changes might contribute. Noting the season is useful context.

28 likes 9mo

KnowltonTL3Regular15 Oct 2025#16

post #15 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Seasonal patterns: some people report weight loss is slower in winter than summer. Body composition and activity changes might contribute. Noting the season is useful context.

31 likes 9mo

p.silvaTL2 Moderator16 Oct 2025#21

post #20 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Medication changes: escalating dose, or adding or removing other medications, can affect the rate of weight loss. Documenting medication changes alongside weight makes the record interpretable.

31 likes 9mo

ppm_errorTL3Analytical chemist20 Oct 2025#42

crossover_review, post #2: Longitudinal report with the method stated: same scale, same time of day, same conditions. A scale is a tool; use the same one each time. Consistency matters more than accuracy at capturing absolute weight. Go to post

I read post #40 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Medication changes: escalating dose, or adding or removing other medications, can affect the rate of weight loss. Documenting medication changes alongside weight makes the record interpretable.

28 likes in reply to #2 9mo

c.haddadTL2 Moderator22 Oct 2025 · edited#49

This follows post #46 rather than contradicting it.

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

27 likes 9mo

t.kulkarniTL3Regular22 Oct 2025 · edited#54

c.haddad, post #49: This follows post #46 rather than contradicting it. For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use. Go to post

Plateaus and resets: if weight loss stalls and then resumes, that is ordinary. It is not evidence that the medication stopped working. It is not evidence that it is still working either. It is a data point in a longer record.

31 likes in reply to #49 9mo

s.vogelTL2 Moderator25 Oct 2025 · edited#66

Non-scale victories: muscle gain or maintenance, clothing fit, energy level, and capability (like climbing stairs without breathlessness) are measurements that scale-based weight misses.

29 likes 9mo

k.kimaniTL2 Moderator26 Oct 2025#78

post #77 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Rate of change: reporting progress as "lost 5 kg in 12 weeks" is more useful than "currently at 82 kg" because the rate tells you whether the change is steady, accelerating, or stalling.

27 likes 9mo

z.vogelTL2 Moderator29 Oct 2025#95

e.kuusela, post #43: post #42 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use. Go to post

Longitudinal report with the method stated: same scale, same time of day, same conditions. A scale is a tool; use the same one each time. Consistency matters more than accuracy at capturing absolute weight.

32 likes in reply to #43 9mo

Read the full topic (98 posts)

This topic was referenced in

Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings misleadOutcomes › Progress reports · 125 replies
Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs hereOutcomes › Progress reports · 29 replies

Suggested topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
A 40-week log with the measurement method stated — does this still hold? Outcomes › Progress reports effect size DXA data table Solved A 40-week log with the measurement method stated — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Longitudinal report with the method stated,…	+1	5	14k	2mo
An 18-month record including the parts that went badly Outcomes › Progress reports data table long read effect size DXA An 18-month record including the parts that went badly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method is…	+77	81	17k	12h
A plateau that disappeared when I changed how I measured Outcomes › Progress reports DXA long read effect size Posting this under the heading it deserves: A plateau that disappeared when I changed how I measured Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…	+27	31	7.2k	3mo
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead — one year on Outcomes › Progress reports DXA data table long read Solved On the subject in the title: Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without…	+78	88	16k	5mo
[2026 update] Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Outcomes › Progress reports DXA long read data table Pinned Closed On the subject in the title: Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Working notes rather than a conclusion. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method is…		2	11k	8mo

Related topics — sharing the tags DXA, long read, data table

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
About the Body composition category Outcomes › Body composition DXA bioimpedance lean mass loss Pinned Wiki DXA, BIA, ultrasound and the precision of each. Lean mass preservation during rapid loss. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…		5	64k	15mo
A plateau that disappeared when I changed how I measured — the long version Outcomes › Progress reports effect size data table long read A plateau that disappeared when I changed how I measured — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…	+49	54	9.4k	1mo
Second pass at: Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules Access › Pricing cost per milligram data table compounding formulary Second pass at: Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in…	+13	17	1.8k	16mo
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits Research Methods › N-of-1 designs confounding data table effect size On the subject in the title: Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019) with STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) and finding the…	+40	44	33k	5d
Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully — a second dataset Outcomes › Progress reports effect size data table long read Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that…	+77	81	16k	11h