Picking up post #148: that is the part I would want checked first.
Promoted topic withdrawal: if a promoted topic becomes outdated or inaccurate and the maintainer does not update, requesting withdrawal is appropriate.
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Picking up post #148: that is the part I would want checked first.
Promoted topic withdrawal: if a promoted topic becomes outdated or inaccurate and the maintainer does not update, requesting withdrawal is appropriate.
Coming back to post #150, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
New maintainer recruitment: if a page's maintainer is inactive and updates are needed, suggesting a new maintainer here can help transition responsibility.
This follows post #152 rather than contradicting it.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
Revision disputes: if you disagree with an edit a maintainer made to a page, discuss it here. The goal is accuracy and clarity, not authorship.
Evidence synthesis requests: if you think a page should summarise the state of evidence on a question, and you think the information exists but is scattered, suggest how it could be brought together.
Multilingual versions: if a maintained page should exist in another language, suggesting it here with your willingness to help translate can make it happen.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Review date disputes: if a maintained page's review date is approaching and it has not been updated, post a note so the maintainers notice.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion…
|
+39 | 50 | 26k | 22h |
|
What happens when a maintainer goes quiet
The question in the title: What happens when a maintainer goes quiet I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The…
|
+3 | 7 | 13k | 2.1y |
|
A promotion I argued against, and why I lost — a second dataset
A promotion I argued against, and why I lost — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation…
|
+3 | 7 | 32k | 12h |
|
Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked? Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question…
|
+20 | 24 | 20k | 15mo |
|
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation…
|
+120 | 129 | 4.1k | 15mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Process question about how this site works. I have…
|
+45 | 50 | 33k | 20mo |
|
Follow-up: Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked?
The question in the title: Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Nominating something for promotion into the…
|
2 | 64k | 16mo | |
|
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion…
|
+39 | 50 | 26k | 22h |
|
Merging two pages that cover the same ground
Merging two pages that cover the same ground Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in…
|
2 | 888 | 13mo | |
|
What happens when a maintainer goes quiet
The question in the title: What happens when a maintainer goes quiet I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The…
|
+3 | 7 | 13k | 2.1y |