Sample size in n-of-1: you are the sample. Repeated measurements (weekly weighings, daily mood scores) increase the power to detect a real effect even though n=1.
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits — the long version
post #5 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
Designing a personal experiment that could actually change your mind: that is the standard for an n-of-1 design. An experiment designed so that any result confirms what you already believed has not changed anything.
Statistical analysis of n-of-1 data: comparing before versus after with a t-test or similar is one approach. Plotting the data visually is another. Both are valid.
post #10 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
Read the full topic (12 posts)
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022). Please read it before…
|
+2 | 6 | 695 | 6mo |
|
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) with SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) and finding the…
|
+96 | 119 | 58k | 14mo |
|
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic — does this still hold?
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Comparing SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021)…
|
+41 | 45 | 12k | 1d |
|
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) cited in support of…
|
+60 | 66 | 35k | 3mo |
|
An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before…
|
+106 | 118 | 25k | 4mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags worked example, effect size, confounding
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully — a second dataset
Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that…
|
+77 | 81 | 16k | 11h |
|
How to ask a question when you cannot say why you are asking it
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How to ask a question when you cannot say why you are asking it Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the things people…
|
+49 | 53 | 36k | 4h |
|
An 18-month record including the parts that went badly
An 18-month record including the parts that went badly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method is…
|
+77 | 81 | 17k | 12h |
|
Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+1 | 5 | 12k | 15mo |
|
[2026 update] Amylin and gastric emptying: overlapping mechanisms with incretins
Amylin and gastric emptying: overlapping mechanisms with incretins — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024). Please read it before…
|
+21 | 25 | 44k | 5mo |