Off-target structures: if the sequence synthesis goes wrong, a completely different amino acid can be incorporated. The resulting off-target peptide is a structural isomer with the same mass but a different sequence. No chromatographic purity method detects this without a reference standard.
Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version
Coming back to post #4, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Deamidation at asparagine and glutamine: adds 1 approximately. Frequently appears as a close-eluting pair. It is a chemical modification that occurs during storage.
post #15 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Deletion sequences (incomplete coupling during synthesis): lower in mass by one residue. Chromatographically they usually elute earlier or later depending on the residue's hydrophobicity. They are the most common impurity in solid-phase synthesis.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Read the full topic (26 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Racemisation and why it is invisible to a mass measurementAnalytics › Impurities & related substances · 127 replies
- Follow-up: Trifluoroacetate content and its consequencesAnalytics › Impurities & related substances · 16 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Impurities & related substances category
Deletion sequences, oxidation, deamidation, aggregates, residual solvents, and counter-ion content. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…
|
+6 | 10 | 50k | 15h |
|
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
2 | 22k | 4mo | |
|
Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from Everything below is what sits behind that. A documentation question rather than an…
|
+47 | 51 | 3.3k | 5mo |
|
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
2 | 15k | 18mo | |
|
Follow-up: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting the method first, because I know what the first…
|
+15 | 19 | 671 | 17mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags water content, endotoxin testing, data table
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[2026 update] Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments
On the subject in the title: Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+65 | 70 | 1.1k | 16d |
|
Cleaning a self-reported dataset and what you throw away
Cleaning a self-reported dataset and what you throw away — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate in…
|
2 | 28k | 1d | |
|
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
2 | 15k | 18mo | |
|
Solubility limits and what a cloudy solution is telling you
Solubility limits and what a cloudy solution is telling you — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate…
|
+11 | 15 | 34k | 20h |
|
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical…
|
+112 | 120 | 7.6k | 5h |