The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 26, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
SC
s.cabreraTL2 Moderator5 Jul 2026#3
d.bakker, post #1: On the subject in the title: Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. semaglutide has a monoisotopic mass close to 4113.6 Da. On an electrospray instrument I would expect to see the multiply charged… Go to post

Off-target structures: if the sequence synthesis goes wrong, a completely different amino acid can be incorporated. The resulting off-target peptide is a structural isomer with the same mass but a different sequence. No chromatographic purity method detects this without a reference standard.

17 likes in reply to #1 23d
JW
journalclub_wrenTL3Regular9 Jul 2026#6
d.bakker, post #1: On the subject in the title: Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. semaglutide has a monoisotopic mass close to 4113.6 Da. On an electrospray instrument I would expect to see the multiply charged… Go to post

Coming back to post #4, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

Deamidation at asparagine and glutamine: adds 1 approximately. Frequently appears as a close-eluting pair. It is a chemical modification that occurs during storage.

11 likes in reply to #1 19d
HA
h.agyemanTL2 Moderator10 Jul 2026#7

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

24 likes 18d
MM
maintenance_modeTL3Regular19 Jul 2026#16

post #15 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Deletion sequences (incomplete coupling during synthesis): lower in mass by one residue. Chromatographically they usually elute earlier or later depending on the residue's hydrophobicity. They are the most common impurity in solid-phase synthesis.

31 likes 9d
K
KLindqvistTL4 Moderator22 Jul 2026#20

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

23 likes 6d

Read the full topic (26 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
About the Impurities & related substances category
Deletion sequences, oxidation, deamidation, aggregates, residual solvents, and counter-ion content. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…
BNHSDSSDBW+6 10 50k 15h
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
DNSGMB 2 22k 4mo
Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from Everything below is what sits behind that. A documentation question rather than an…
SABJBPJSMS+47 51 3.3k 5mo
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
SHOWM 2 15k 18mo
Follow-up: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting the method first, because I know what the first…
KIABCSGV+15 19 671 17mo

Related topics — sharing the tags water content, endotoxin testing, data table

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
[2026 update] Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments
On the subject in the title: Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
BIISCJBSG+65 70 1.1k 16d
Cleaning a self-reported dataset and what you throw away
Cleaning a self-reported dataset and what you throw away — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate in…
SCFISC 2 28k 1d
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
SHOWM 2 15k 18mo
Solubility limits and what a cloudy solution is telling you
Solubility limits and what a cloudy solution is telling you — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate…
SISSVKYRVS+11 15 34k 20h
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical…
PNTDHFEFJR+112 120 7.6k 5h