Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.
Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.
Something adjacent that I have been thinking about and that does not belong in any of the technical categories. No question in particular; I am interested in how other people see it.
No spam: introductions are not a place to advertise commercial products or services. That is a rules violation.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
I read post #3 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Following up: if you introduce yourself and someone asks a follow-up question, you can reply here or in a direct message depending on what feels right.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — does this still hold? Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a…
|
+1 | 5 | 35k | 19mo |
|
[2026 update] Long-time reader, first-time poster
Long-time reader, first-time poster — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim. Something adjacent…
|
+46 | 50 | 23k | 5mo |
|
Joined after a search result and stayed
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Joined after a search result and stayed Everything below is what sits behind that. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
|
+5 | 9 | 26k | 7h |
|
[2026 update] Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a…
|
2 | 49k | 4mo | |
|
About the Introductions category
Say hello. No question required. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a note. If the scope described here has drifted…
|
4 | 2.3k | 23mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the How to Ask category
Framing a question so that it can actually be answered: what to include, what to leave out, and why we ask for units. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every…
|
+6 | 10 | 11k | 4mo |
|
Coming back to: Getting a referral rather than a refusal
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Getting a referral rather than a refusal Everything below is what sits behind that. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I know the…
|
+69 | 74 | 1.7k | 13mo |
|
Second pass at: Food noise reducing and the disorientation that can follow
Second pass at: Food noise reducing and the disorientation that can follow — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The…
|
+55 | 59 | 965 | 21mo |
|
How to ask for a dose change without antagonising anyone
The question in the title: How to ask for a dose change without antagonising anyone I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Asking about a population rather than about a person.…
|
+19 | 23 | 2.9k | 23mo |
|
Spreadsheets: an appreciation
On the subject in the title: Spreadsheets: an appreciation Working notes rather than a conclusion. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim. Something adjacent that I…
|
+26 | 30 | 25k | 2.1y |