Frequency: three sessions per week of full-body training is easier to maintain than higher frequencies on an energy deficit. Consistency beats intensity when recovery capacity is limited.
Recovery when intake is low: what to cut first
Cardio and resistance: the interaction between energy-intense cardiovascular training and resistance training is real. Moderate cardio is fine; excessive endurance training can interfere with muscle maintenance.
Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.
Picking up post #43: that is the part I would want checked first.
Frequency: three sessions per week of full-body training is easier to maintain than higher frequencies on an energy deficit. Consistency beats intensity when recovery capacity is limited.
Coming back to post #52, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
post #58 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Recovery: heavier training on a energy deficit and on a compound that slows gastric emptying requires attention to recovery (sleep, nutrition, stress). Recovery capacity declines with deficit, so training volume might need adjustment.
Cardio and resistance: the interaction between energy-intense cardiovascular training and resistance training is real. Moderate cardio is fine; excessive endurance training can interfere with muscle maintenance.
Maintenance is the goal: preserving lean mass and strength during weight loss is the goal of resistance training in this context, not building new muscle. That goal is usually achievable with consistent, moderate training.
Read the full topic (92 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Coming back to: Training through a dose escalation weekNutrition & Training › Resistance training · 74 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports
On the subject in the title: Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports Working notes rather than a conclusion. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method…
|
+27 | 31 | 22k | 20mo |
|
Progressive overload when the scale is falling
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Progressive overload when the scale is falling Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a…
|
+4 | 8 | 14k | 8mo |
|
Programming during a large energy deficit
Programming during a large energy deficit — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes about. I have…
|
+39 | 49 | 36k | 2d |
|
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly Everything below is what sits behind that. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this…
|
+60 | 70 | 38k | 4mo |
|
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…
|
+152 | 167 | 6.6k | 21mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags lean mass loss, DXA, fatigue
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost…
|
+109 | 125 | 42k | 10h |
|
Revisiting: Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…
|
2 | 2.8k | 1mo | |
|
Shakes versus food: a pragmatic assessment
Shakes versus food: a pragmatic assessment Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes…
|
+22 | 26 | 53k | 20h |
|
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…
|
+152 | 167 | 6.6k | 21mo |
|
How much fluid is actually needed, and how you would know
The question in the title: How much fluid is actually needed, and how you would know I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this…
|
+11 | 15 | 53k | 2mo |