Revisiting: Joined after a search result and stayed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did.
Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.
Something adjacent that I have been thinking about and that does not belong in any of the technical categories. No question in particular; I am interested in how other people see it.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Introductions category
Say hello. No question required. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a note. If the scope described here has drifted…
|
4 | 2.3k | 23mo | |
|
Joined after a search result and stayed
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Joined after a search result and stayed Everything below is what sits behind that. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
|
+5 | 9 | 26k | 7h |
|
[2026 update] Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a…
|
2 | 49k | 4mo | |
|
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — does this still hold? Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a…
|
+1 | 5 | 35k | 19mo |
|
Long-time reader, first-time poster
On the subject in the title: Long-time reader, first-time poster Working notes rather than a conclusion. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim. Something adjacent…
|
+15 | 19 | 2.5k | 8mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
When to stop reading forums, including this one — the long version
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: When to stop reading forums, including this one — the long version General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I know the…
|
+23 | 27 | 8.3k | 14mo |
|
Follow-up: The most useful thing you learned here that was not the answer you came for
On the subject in the title: The most useful thing you learned here that was not the answer you came for Working notes rather than a conclusion. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if…
|
+30 | 34 | 9.7k | 11h |
|
How to ask about something you suspect is a bad idea
The question in the title: How to ask about something you suspect is a bad idea I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to…
|
+81 | 87 | 16k | 2mo |
|
Why we ask for units every single time, with three examples of what goes wrong
Why we ask for units every single time, with three examples of what goes wrong — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Question in the title. Context below,…
|
+118 | 135 | 2.2k | 11d |
|
Talking to a therapist about this specifically
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Talking to a therapist about this specifically Everything below is what sits behind that. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The published trials…
|
+20 | 24 | 855 | 14h |