System suitability: injections run at the start of a batch to establish that the instrument and column are performing. Acceptance criteria typically include replicate precision (RSD ≤2%), peak tailing (0.8–1.5), theoretical plates (>2000), and resolution (>1.5).
Sample handling between despatch and injection posts 61–69
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Accuracy: the method measures what you intend to measure. For purity methods, this is tested by spike-and-recover experiments: add a known amount of impurity to a sample and measure whether you recover the added amount.
I read post #61 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
This follows post #61 rather than contradicting it.
Linearity: the detector response is proportional to compound concentration across the working range. Demonstrated by running standards at multiple concentrations and showing R-squared values typically ≥0.99.
Specificity: the method can distinguish the intended compound from related impurities and degradation products. Tested by comparing results on pure compounds, mixtures of compounds, and degraded samples.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Transfer between laboratories: a method can be transferred from one lab to another, but the receiving lab needs to demonstrate that they can achieve the same performance. This requires comparative testing and sometimes small method refinements.
Picking up post #65: that is the part I would want checked first.
Stability-indicating method: one that can separate a compound from its degradation products. Critical for assay methods that claim to measure actual degradation (as opposed to purity, which is orthogonal).
Worth separating two things that post #65 runs together.
Limits of detection and quantitation: LOD is the lowest concentration that produces a signal above background. LOQ is the lowest concentration at which the method meets precision and accuracy acceptance criteria. Both are determined empirically.
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Revisiting: Sample handling between despatch and injection
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Sample handling between despatch and injection Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+5 | 9 | 1.1k | 6mo |
|
About the Method validation category
Specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, robustness, system suitability, and why two labs disagree. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is…
|
+1 | 5 | 468 | 5mo |
|
Relative retention time as a better inter-laboratory comparator
On the subject in the title: Relative retention time as a better inter-laboratory comparator Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will…
|
+7 | 11 | 28k | 14mo |
|
Repeatability versus intermediate precision — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Repeatability versus intermediate precision — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like…
|
4 | 21k | 5h | |
|
Forced degradation studies: designing one that is informative — does this still hold?
The question in the title: Forced degradation studies: designing one that is informative — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. A documentation question…
|
+37 | 41 | 1.2k | 12mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags stability-indicating method, LOD & LOQ, linearity
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice — a second dataset
Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
|
+75 | 82 | 17k | 12h |
|
Robustness: the parameters worth deliberately varying
Robustness: the parameters worth deliberately varying Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
+53 | 57 | 664 | 8mo |
|
Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches: the specificity problem
Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches: the specificity problem — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
2 | 4k | 9mo | |
|
Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no
Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
|
+50 | 56 | 9.8k | 1d |
|
Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with real criteria — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with real criteria — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity…
|
+53 | 58 | 7.5k | 6mo |