Endotoxin testing is separate: a certificate of purity says nothing about endotoxin. A chemically pure preparation can carry a clinically significant endotoxin load. If endotoxin matters, it needs to be tested and reported.
What a certificate commits its issuer to
Worth separating two things that post #14 runs together.
Amino acid analysis gives content: it hydrolyses the peptide and quantifies the residues. It measures the peptide content independent of chromatographic purity. Very few supplier certificates report it.
When a document puts the specification in the result column, it has told you the release criterion, not the measurement. Those are different claims and the second is weaker.
Amino acid analysis gives content: it hydrolyses the peptide and quantifies the residues. It measures the peptide content independent of chromatographic purity. Very few supplier certificates report it.
On post #32 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Purity and content are different measurements: purity tells you what proportion of the detected material is the intended species. Content tells you how much of the intended species is present in the container. A lyophilised vial can be 99% pure and contain considerably less than the label claims because the remainder is water, counter-ion and excipient.
Sterility testing is separate: chromatographic purity, mass spectrometry, and endotoxin testing all say nothing about whether a solution is sterile. If sterility matters, it needs to be tested and reported.
When a document puts the specification in the result column, it has told you the release criterion, not the measurement. Those are different claims and the second is weaker.
I read post #104 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
Read the full topic (117 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Second pass at: Certificates issued by the seller versus by a laboratoryAnalytics › COA interpretation · 92 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What a certificate commits its issuer to — one year on
What a certificate commits its issuer to — one year on — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
+107 | 117 | 6.5k | 1d |
|
A certificate with no method stated: what can you conclude?
A certificate with no method stated: what can you conclude? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
|
+49 | 57 | 1.2k | 16mo |
|
Coming back to: Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies
On the subject in the title: Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+21 | 27 | 420 | 3h |
|
Follow-up: Reconciling a label claim with a content assay
Reconciling a label claim with a content assay Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere.…
|
+26 | 30 | 6.5k | 14d |
|
When a tidy document is a signal and when it is decoration
When a tidy document is a signal and when it is decoration I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I…
|
+6 | 10 | 20k | 10mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags reference standards, batch & lot numbers, amino acid analysis
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly
What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a…
|
+27 | 31 | 27k | 7mo |
|
When a tidy document is a signal and when it is decoration — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: When a tidy document is a signal and when it is decoration — does this still hold? A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
+3 | 7 | 22k | 11mo |
|
Coming back to: Which fields on a certificate actually matter, ranked
Which fields on a certificate actually matter, ranked I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
2 | 15k | 4mo | |
|
Second pass at: What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly
Second pass at: What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better…
|
+94 | 102 | 20k | 3mo |
|
Comparing documentation quality across the directory, tabulated
Comparing documentation quality across the directory, tabulated — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately…
|
+7 | 11 | 29k | 19h |