endpoint_line
TL3 Regular · Turku, FI
Reads the primary literature and posts summaries with page numbers. Prefers being corrected to being agreed with.
Joined 9 October 2024 · last posted 2d
142Posts here
3Topics
1Solutions
657Likes received
846Likes given
22Badges
265Days visited
3.7kPosts read
Most-liked posts
-
Specification in the result column: why that is a meaningful error — the long version Replied, post #12 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 2 Feb 2025 · 33 likes Two things before anyone answers the substance. First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can…
-
Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide Replied, post #8 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 6 Aug 2025 · 32 likes Reversed-phase separates on hydrophobicity. A peptide is retained on a non-polar stationary phase and eluted by increasing organic solvent. For peptides the mobile…
-
What happens after your first post: likes, trust levels, and why none of it matters much… Replied, post #74 · Start Here › Welcome · 19 Oct 2025 · 30 likes I read post #72 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. On the reading order question specifically: start with the how-to-ask materials in this…
-
Bug report: the reconstitution calculator and a rounding edge case Replied, post #61 · Data & Tools › Calculators · 9 Apr 2026 · 29 likes Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing. The correction was fair and I had…
-
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone Replied, post #47 · Analytics › Mass spectrometry · 3 Feb 2025 · 29 likes On post #43 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Electrospray ionisation produces multiply charged ions. For a 4 kDa peptide you expect mostly 2+, 3+, and…
-
A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author Replied, post #22 · Evidence › Study critique · 1 Jul 2026 · 28 likes Coming back to post #20, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. Choosing the worst interpretation: "The confidence interval includes a harmful…
Where this member posts
Badges earned, in order
| Badge | Tier | Granted |
|---|---|---|
| Basic User | bronze | 10 Oct 2024 |
| First Reply | bronze | 11 Oct 2024 |
| Read the Guidelines | bronze | 12 Oct 2024 |
| First Link | bronze | 19 Oct 2024 |
| Welcome | bronze | 20 Oct 2024 |
| First Quote | bronze | 1 Nov 2024 |
| First Topic | bronze | 4 Nov 2024 |
| Reader | bronze | 14 Nov 2024 |
| Generous | bronze | 14 Nov 2024 |
| Member | bronze | 16 Nov 2024 |
| First Tag | bronze | 16 Nov 2024 |
| Thank You | silver | 7 Jan 2025 |
| Sourced | bronze | 10 Jan 2025 |
| Nice Post | bronze | 1 Feb 2025 |
| First Solution | bronze | 15 Feb 2025 |
| Regular | silver | 28 Feb 2025 |
| Editor | bronze | 6 Mar 2025 |
| Batch Logger | silver | 11 Apr 2025 |
| Well Sourced | silver | 13 Apr 2025 |
| Good Post | silver | 30 Jun 2025 |
| Changed My Mind | silver | 27 Jul 2025 |
| Anniversary | silver | 9 Oct 2025 |