The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
RM

r.marsden

TL3 Regular · Granada, ES

Laboratory background. Comfortable with chromatography, cautious about extrapolating from a single certificate.

Joined 11 November 2024 · last posted 1d · groups: analytical-chemists

159Posts here
5Topics
0Solutions
2.3kLikes received
2.7kLikes given
32Badges
358Days visited
8.9kPosts read

Most-liked posts

  • Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice Started this topic · Analytics › Home & field testing · 14 Apr 2025 · 48 likes On the subject in the title: Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this…
  • Maintainer handover: how it works Replied, post #29 · Meta › Wiki maintenance · 15 Mar 2025 · 31 likes Orphaned pages: if a page has no incoming links and is not reachable from navigation, it is orphaned. Such pages should either be linked or deprecated.
  • Identical chromatograms across two different lots Replied, post #61 · Sourcing › Red flags · 12 Dec 2024 · 31 likes Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing. The correction was fair and I had…
  • SNAC and the mechanism of oral peptide absorption — the long version Started this topic · Compounds › Oral incretins · 6 Sep 2024 · 31 likes SNAC and the mechanism of oral peptide absorption — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen…
  • Request: show the solution author in the topic list — what changed since Replied, post #9 · Meta › Feature requests · 30 Apr 2026 · 29 likes Alternatives: if you have thought of a way the current site might already serve your need, mention it. It helps assess whether the feature is truly missing or just not…
  • The topic list is dense — is that deliberate? Replied, post #72 · Meta › Site feedback · 25 Dec 2024 · 29 likes I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological. The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at…

Where this member posts

CategoryPostsShare
Compounds2918%
Analytics2113%
Practice1912%
Sourcing159%
Evidence128%
Meta85%

Badges earned, in order

BadgeTierGranted
Basic Userbronze12 Nov 2024
First Replybronze12 Nov 2024
Read the Guidelinesbronze13 Nov 2024
First Linkbronze19 Nov 2024
Welcomebronze23 Nov 2024
First Quotebronze1 Dec 2024
First Topicbronze4 Dec 2024
Readerbronze8 Dec 2024
Generousbronze10 Dec 2024
First Tagbronze26 Dec 2024
Memberbronze29 Dec 2024
First Chromatogrambronze22 Jan 2025
Sourcedbronze1 Feb 2025
Submitted a Samplesilver18 Feb 2025
Nice Postbronze19 Feb 2025
Consistently Generoussilver13 Mar 2025
Reads a COAsilver22 Mar 2025
Nice Topicbronze24 Mar 2025
Editorbronze26 Mar 2025
Well Sourcedsilver22 Apr 2025
Regularsilver10 May 2025
Mass Accuracysilver2 Jun 2025
Batch Loggersilver23 Jun 2025
Good Topicsilver2 Jul 2025
Good Postsilver11 Jul 2025
Thank Yousilver29 Aug 2025
Method Firstsilver31 Aug 2025
Changed My Mindsilver8 Oct 2025
Anniversarysilver11 Nov 2025
Wiki Maintainergold2 Dec 2025
Gives Backgold4 Jan 2026
Relentlessly Generousgold8 Feb 2026