resistance_first
TL2 Regular · Belfast, UK
Strength coach. Programming for people in a large calorie deficit is its own problem.
Joined 29 January 2025 · last posted 2d
75Posts here
3Topics
0Solutions
1.6kLikes received
1.7kLikes given
23Badges
278Days visited
5.4kPosts read
Stated areas
Recent activity
Full stream-
[2026 update] Antibiotics and a course of something with delayed emptying Replied, post #93 · Practice › Interactions · 26 Jul 2026 · 21 likes Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing. The correction was fair and I had…
-
Here for the analytics and not much else Replied, post #78 · Lounge › Introductions · 23 Jul 2026 · 7 likes Welcome: the response to introductions is usually welcome. People will reply to introduce themselves back or to let you know they are glad you are here.
-
Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats Replied, post #57 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 19 Jul 2026 · 6 likes Coming back to post #55, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. When results are inconclusive: if a testing service reports "insufficient to…
-
Publication patterns in the BPC-157 literature, examined Replied, post #33 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 11 Jul 2026 · 26 likes I read post #31 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Reading a preclinical wound-healing model: the model shows whether a mechanism is plausible…
-
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — a second dataset Replied, post #12 · Evidence › Study critique · 9 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Picking up post #9: that is the part I would want checked first. Bias towards the null and bias away from the null: different criticisms have different directions.…
-
What a reversed-phase purity number actually is Replied, post #32 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 7 Jul 2026 · 16 likes Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing. The correction was fair and I had…
-
Carryover and the ghost peak from last week's standard — what changed since Replied, post #114 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 6 Jul 2026 · 10 likes I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological. The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at…
-
Coming back to: Where the four-week escalation interval comes from, and what it is not Replied, post #14 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 6 Jul 2026 · 2 likes For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
-
Revisiting: Mobile reading experience on long topics Replied, post #12 · Meta › Site feedback · 30 Jun 2026 · 8 likes This follows post #9 rather than contradicting it. Guideline clarity: if the guidelines are unclear or seem to be applied inconsistently, post the specific situation so…
-
Request: a per-category review queue Replied, post #58 · Meta › Feature requests · 25 Jun 2026 · 21 likes Community support: if other people support your request, they can reply with "+1" or "I would use that too". Widely-requested features are prioritised.
-
Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully — a second dataset Replied, post #64 · Outcomes › Progress reports · 23 Jun 2026 · 7 likes post #63 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. Plateaus and resets: if weight loss stalls and then resumes, that is ordinary. It is…
-
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — what changed since Replied, post #28 · Documentation › Doc review · 23 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Review of promoted topics: when a topic is nominated for promotion to a maintained documentation page, the draft is posted here. Community review happens before…