The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Analytics · Method validation

LOD and LOQ: definitions people get wrong

Closed
EI
e.iyerTL2 Moderator12 Nov 2025#1

LOD and LOQ: definitions people get wrong — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.

A documentation question rather than an analytical one.

I have a certificate in front of me that reports a purity figure, names a technique, gives a wavelength, and stops. No gradient, no column, no injection volume, no chromatogram.

What can I legitimately conclude from that document? My instinct is "almost nothing, but not literally nothing", and I would like to know where the people who read these professionally draw the line.

2 likes 8mo
SF
s.ferreiraTL2 Moderator18 Nov 2025#2

Range: the concentration range over which the method has been validated. Going outside the validated range is going outside the method's demonstrated performance.

0 likes 8mo
CN
c.niemelTL3Regular22 Nov 2025 · edited#3

Worth separating two things that the opening post runs together.

Two things before anyone answers the substance.

First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.

22 likes 8mo
This topic was closed 180 days after the last reply. Closing is automatic for quiet topics so that a settled answer does not collect new questions underneath it. If you have a follow-up, open a new topic and link back to this one — that keeps both readable and gives your question its own title.

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
An inter-laboratory comparison on one lot, tabulated
On the subject in the title: An inter-laboratory comparison on one lot, tabulated Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. semaglutide has a…
ZAMGCRKB 3 17k 10mo
When to suspect the method rather than the sample
When to suspect the method rather than the sample — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies…
MMCCYMRMBJ+109 115 63k 15mo
Robustness: the parameters worth deliberately varying
Robustness: the parameters worth deliberately varying Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
EFBVPRPOL+53 57 664 8mo
What a stability-indicating method is and how you demonstrate one — one year on
What a stability-indicating method is and how you demonstrate one — one year on I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. A documentation question rather than…
FPHETPNNCG+100 112 15k 19mo
Relative retention time as a better inter-laboratory comparator
On the subject in the title: Relative retention time as a better inter-laboratory comparator Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will…
MCVKSKHVCL+7 11 28k 14mo

Related topics — sharing the tags precision & repeatability, recovery, stability-indicating method

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Forced degradation studies: designing one that is informative — does this still hold?
The question in the title: Forced degradation studies: designing one that is informative — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. A documentation question…
RJAKNKISC+37 41 1.2k 12mo
Revisiting: Why I ask for the gradient before I discuss the number
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Why I ask for the gradient before I discuss the number Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means…
DNIDGHECFA+15 19 43k 10mo
Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with real criteria
Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with real criteria Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this…
FNISMLAWM+44 48 12k 1d
Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree
On the subject in the title: Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will…
BWZVGFFEDI+78 84 1.7k 8mo
Repeatability versus intermediate precision
Repeatability versus intermediate precision — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
LSKAILWNO+119 134 34k 13mo