The C-cell question: semaglutide triggered medullary thyroid carcinoma in rodent toxicology studies. A signal in rodents does not automatically appear in humans, but it is the reason the compound is contraindicated in people with personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2.
Semaglutide and gastric emptying — the mechanism behind most of the side-effect profile
The SELECT trial changed the positioning because it was the first cardiovascular outcome trial in people without diabetes. That decoupled the cardiovascular argument from glycaemic control, which is why it mattered beyond its own numbers.
The STEP programme populations were selected: enrollment criteria required baseline body mass index over 30, no recent blood pressure crisis, no recent retinopathy, no renal disease at the time. Applying results from that population to someone well outside it is an extrapolation and should be called one.
The 165 to 184 hour range: that is roughly 7 to 7.6 days, which is why the weekly schedule works. Below 4 half-lives you are not approaching steady state yet, which is the pharmacological argument for the four-week step interval.
Is there a ceiling dose beyond which the effect plateaus? The trials did not study that because they stopped at 2.4 mg. Some people report trying higher doses, but trial data is absent and off-label dosing enters territory this site does not advise on.
post #101 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Semaglutide versus liraglutide in STEP 8: semaglutide produced greater weight reduction and the discontinuation rates differed. But the trial was open-label for the dosing schedule, which admits expectation effects. Weekly versus daily itself is part of the comparison, not a confounding variable to be removed.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
Read the full topic (123 posts)
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Semaglutide and alcohol: what is actually documented
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Semaglutide and alcohol: what is actually documented Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) cited in support of a claim I do…
|
+14 | 18 | 10k | 2d |
|
The most common factual error about semaglutide on the internet — what changed since
The most common factual error about semaglutide on the internet — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with STEP 1 ( N…
|
+42 | 46 | 1.7k | 5mo |
|
What the published dose-response for semaglutide actually looks like above 2.4 mg — a second dataset
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What the published dose-response for semaglutide actually looks like above 2.4 mg — a second dataset Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med ,…
|
+112 | 130 | 2.2k | 16mo |
|
Semaglutide in people without diabetes: what the evidence base looks like
Semaglutide in people without diabetes: what the evidence base looks like Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016).…
|
+2 | 6 | 18k | 17mo |
|
Is there a ceiling dose beyond which semaglutide stops adding benefit?
Is there a ceiling dose beyond which semaglutide stops adding benefit? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in…
|
2 | 14k | 2mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags STEP programme, type 2 diabetes, randomised trial
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Semaglutide half-life: where the 165 to 184 hour figure comes from — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Semaglutide half-life: where the 165 to 184 hour figure comes from — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022)…
|
+125 | 132 | 39k | 16mo |
|
How to read a phase 2 result without treating it as a phase 3 result — what changed since
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How to read a phase 2 result without treating it as a phase 3 result — what changed since Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it…
|
+25 | 35 | 568 | 6mo |
|
Reading a combination trial: attributing effect to components
On the subject in the title: Reading a combination trial: attributing effect to components Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before…
|
4 | 19k | 11mo | |
|
Second opinions: how to seek one without burning the first
Second opinions: how to seek one without burning the first Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I…
|
+1 | 5 | 33k | 19mo |
|
Coming back to: Preparing for an appointment: one page, three questions
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Preparing for an appointment: one page, three questions Everything below is what sits behind that. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I…
|
+139 | 151 | 47k | 18mo |