Off-target structures: if the sequence synthesis goes wrong, a completely different amino acid can be incorporated. The resulting off-target peptide is a structural isomer with the same mass but a different sequence. No chromatographic purity method detects this without a reference standard.
Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from posts 31–60
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.
Deamidation at asparagine and glutamine: adds 1 approximately. Frequently appears as a close-eluting pair. It is a chemical modification that occurs during storage.
Dimer and higher-order multimers: two or more peptide molecules bonded together. They appear at double the mass and higher. They may or may not separate from the monomer on HPLC depending on the method.
Truncation products: fragments from incomplete synthesis or from degradation. They elute quite differently from the intact peptide because they are much smaller and have different hydrophobicity. They are usually well separated.
post #36 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Off-target structures: if the sequence synthesis goes wrong, a completely different amino acid can be incorporated. The resulting off-target peptide is a structural isomer with the same mass but a different sequence. No chromatographic purity method detects this without a reference standard.
On post #34 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
This follows post #36 rather than contradicting it.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
I read post #38 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Deletion sequences (incomplete coupling during synthesis): lower in mass by one residue. Chromatographically they usually elute earlier or later depending on the residue's hydrophobicity. They are the most common impurity in solid-phase synthesis.
Picking up post #39: that is the part I would want checked first.
Oxidation at methionine and tryptophan: adds 16 per oxygen. Usually elutes earlier. Oxidation is common in storage, especially if the solution is exposed to light or if antioxidants are not present.
Residual solvents: traces of solvents used in purification. These are usually tested by gas chromatography, not by HPLC. A specification for residual solvents should be stated separately from the purity.
Post hidden by community flags
Staff rationale: Hidden by community flags. The claim about a named supplier was not accompanied by a batch, a date, a method or a document, which R6 requires.
Acetate content: counter-ion content. Trifluoroacetate or acetate from the salt form of the peptide. Affects mass calculations and should be stated on a complete certificate.
The corresponding entry is in the public moderation log. Hidden posts are never deleted.
Related substances: compounds chemically related to the target peptide but not the target peptide itself. The standard method separates them and reports them as area percent. How related they can be before they exceed specification is a regulatory question.
Worth separating two things that post #43 runs together.
Disulfide formation: if a peptide contains cysteine, it can form disulfide bonds with itself or with other molecules. Under oxidising conditions multiple species appear. Reducing conditions (like DTT) convert them back.
Off-target structures: if the sequence synthesis goes wrong, a completely different amino acid can be incorporated. The resulting off-target peptide is a structural isomer with the same mass but a different sequence. No chromatographic purity method detects this without a reference standard.
Coming back to post #47, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.
Dimer and higher-order multimers: two or more peptide molecules bonded together. They appear at double the mass and higher. They may or may not separate from the monomer on HPLC depending on the method.
post #50 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
Disulfide formation: if a peptide contains cysteine, it can form disulfide bonds with itself or with other molecules. Under oxidising conditions multiple species appear. Reducing conditions (like DTT) convert them back.
I read post #52 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Acetate content: counter-ion content. Trifluoroacetate or acetate from the salt form of the peptide. Affects mass calculations and should be stated on a complete certificate.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
post #54 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Deletion sequences (incomplete coupling during synthesis): lower in mass by one residue. Chromatographically they usually elute earlier or later depending on the residue's hydrophobicity. They are the most common impurity in solid-phase synthesis.
On post #52 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Oxidation at methionine and tryptophan: adds 16 per oxygen. Usually elutes earlier. Oxidation is common in storage, especially if the solution is exposed to light or if antioxidants are not present.
Truncation products: fragments from incomplete synthesis or from degradation. They elute quite differently from the intact peptide because they are much smaller and have different hydrophobicity. They are usually well separated.
Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.
Incomplete deprotection: mass higher by the protecting group mass. Usually markedly later eluting. A synthesis artifact from incomplete removal of protecting groups.
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means…
|
3 | 347 | 24d | |
|
Follow-up: Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences
On the subject in the title: Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
+12 | 16 | 5.7k | 21mo |
|
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
2 | 15k | 18mo | |
|
Revisiting: Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means…
|
+48 | 53 | 918 | 8mo |
|
[2026 update] A rising related-substance total over six months: degradation or method drift?
The question in the title: A rising related-substance total over six months: degradation or method drift? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Posting the method first, because…
|
+71 | 78 | 34k | 5mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags water content, data table, HPLC
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Carryover and the ghost peak from last week's standard — what changed since
Carryover and the ghost peak from last week's standard — what changed since Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting the method first, because I know what the…
|
+98 | 114 | 37k | 22d |
|
Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version
On the subject in the title: Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+21 | 25 | 6.9k | 10h |
|
Revisiting: Why I ask for the gradient before I discuss the number
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Why I ask for the gradient before I discuss the number Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means…
|
+15 | 19 | 43k | 10mo |
|
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits
On the subject in the title: Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019) with STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) and finding the…
|
+40 | 44 | 33k | 5d |
|
Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences
Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate in front of me…
|
+123 | 134 | 31k | 5mo |