Intersection · Evidence × publication bias

Evidence topics tagged publication bias

Topics in Evidence carrying the tag publication bias. What did not get published, and how we detect its absence.

22 topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
When a network meta-analysis is defensible and when it is not effect size heterogeneity publication bias Solved When a network meta-analysis is defensible and when it is not I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Comparing SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) with LEADER (…		2	27k	4h
Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys heterogeneity effect size publication bias Solved On the subject in the title: Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before posting; the…	+97	107	4k	19h
Risk-of-bias tools and the judgement they conceal — does this still hold? heterogeneity risk of bias effect size publication bias Solved Risk-of-bias tools and the judgement they conceal — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Comparing SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021)…	+26	30	5.8k	23h
Pooling trials with different estimands publication bias risk of bias effect size meta-analysis Solved On the subject in the title: Pooling trials with different estimands Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) with SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) and finding the…	+120	132	2.3k	1d
Publication bias detection and its low power heterogeneity publication bias effect size On the subject in the title: Publication bias detection and its low power Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…		2	3.2k	1d
A pooled estimate that changed when one trial was added meta-analysis publication bias effect size Solved A pooled estimate that changed when one trial was added — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it before posting; the…	+24	28	3.5k	2d
Second pass at: A pooled estimate that changed when one trial was added effect size risk of bias publication bias meta-analysis Wiki On the subject in the title: Second pass at: A pooled estimate that changed when one trial was added Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023). Please read it before…	+26	30	22k	1mo
Publication bias detection and its low power — does this still hold? publication bias risk of bias meta-analysis heterogeneity Solved The question in the title: Publication bias detection and its low power — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I have seen LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016)…	+24	28	2.4k	3mo
Prediction intervals and why they are more honest than confidence intervals heterogeneity risk of bias effect size publication bias Solved Closed Posting this under the heading it deserves: Prediction intervals and why they are more honest than confidence intervals Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024) with FLOW…	+21	25	46k	4mo
Pooling trials with different estimands — what changed since publication bias risk of bias meta-analysis effect size Pooling trials with different estimands — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) with SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) and finding…	+57	64	12k	7mo
What pooling buys you and what it destroys publication bias risk of bias meta-analysis heterogeneity Solved The question in the title: What pooling buys you and what it destroys I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with LEADER ( N Engl J Med ,…	+74	83	6.6k	8mo
Risk-of-bias tools and the judgement they conceal meta-analysis heterogeneity publication bias effect size Wiki Risk-of-bias tools and the judgement they conceal Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do…	+8	12	21k	11mo
[2026 update] Heterogeneity as information rather than as a nuisance publication bias heterogeneity meta-analysis Heterogeneity as information rather than as a nuisance Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a claim I…		4	32k	11mo
Random versus fixed effects: choosing rather than defaulting effect size publication bias risk of bias heterogeneity Closed Random versus fixed effects: choosing rather than defaulting — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024). Please read it before posting;…	+16	20	22k	13mo
About the Meta-analyses category meta-analysis heterogeneity publication bias Pinned Wiki Pooled estimates, heterogeneity, publication bias, and when pooling was a mistake. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author…		4	15k	13mo
Individual participant data versus aggregate data heterogeneity risk of bias meta-analysis publication bias Posting this under the heading it deserves: Individual participant data versus aggregate data Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015). Please read it before…	+30	34	64k	14mo
Coming back to: Reading a meta-analysis you disagree with, fairly meta-analysis publication bias heterogeneity risk of bias Reading a meta-analysis you disagree with, fairly Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do…	+30	34	9.3k	17mo
Random versus fixed effects: choosing rather than defaulting — a second dataset heterogeneity risk of bias publication bias On the subject in the title: Random versus fixed effects: choosing rather than defaulting — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it…	+95	106	20k	17mo
Follow-up: Individual participant data versus aggregate data meta-analysis effect size publication bias heterogeneity Individual participant data versus aggregate data — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) with SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) and finding the…	+101	111	23k	18mo
Second pass at: When a network meta-analysis is defensible and when it is not heterogeneity meta-analysis effect size publication bias Solved Pinned Posting this under the heading it deserves: Second pass at: When a network meta-analysis is defensible and when it is not Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) with LEADER…		2	2.8k	21mo
Coming back to: Prediction intervals and why they are more honest than confidence intervals publication bias heterogeneity effect size risk of bias Prediction intervals and why they are more honest than confidence intervals Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med , 2024)…		2	65	22mo
Reading a meta-analysis you disagree with, fairly heterogeneity risk of bias effect size publication bias Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reading a meta-analysis you disagree with, fairly Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in support of a…	+7	13	2.5k	23mo

Sponsored Sigma-Aldrich — certified reference materialsReference standards, analytical reagents and certified materials for method calibration. If you are validating a method, this is where the standard comes from.Reference standards →