Intersection · Evidence × surrogate endpoints
Evidence topics tagged surrogate endpoints
Topics in Evidence carrying the tag surrogate endpoints. A measurable stand-in for the outcome that actually matters.
24 topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What a statistical analysis plan adds that the paper does not
What a statistical analysis plan adds that the paper does not — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I have seen SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) cited in support…
|
2 | 6.6k | 10h | |
|
Second pass at: Reading a trial's population section before its results
Second pass at: Reading a trial's population section before its results Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in…
|
4 | 9.5k | 10h | |
|
Primary endpoint hierarchies and why order matters — one year on
On the subject in the title: Primary endpoint hierarchies and why order matters — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) with SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med ,…
|
+56 | 61 | 37k | 11h |
|
Composite endpoints and the component doing the work
Composite endpoints and the component doing the work Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do…
|
+3 | 7 | 33k | 13h |
|
Subgroup analyses: pre-specified versus discovered
Subgroup analyses: pre-specified versus discovered — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) and finding the…
|
2 | 27k | 1d | |
|
Interim analyses and stopping rules
Interim analyses and stopping rules Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a claim I do not think…
|
+25 | 29 | 35k | 16d |
|
Run-in periods and the population they select
On the subject in the title: Run-in periods and the population they select Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before posting; the…
|
+130 | 142 | 7.3k | 1mo |
|
Reading a trial's population section before its results
On the subject in the title: Reading a trial's population section before its results Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
|
+91 | 109 | 22k | 2mo |
|
Adjudicated events and why the definition matters
On the subject in the title: Adjudicated events and why the definition matters Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022). Please read it before posting; the…
|
2 | 4.5k | 2mo | |
|
Revisiting: Primary endpoint hierarchies and why order matters
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Primary endpoint hierarchies and why order matters Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024) with SURPASS-2 ( N…
|
+21 | 25 | 46k | 3mo |
|
[2026 update] Composite endpoints and the component doing the work
On the subject in the title: Composite endpoints and the component doing the work Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) with SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) and…
|
+76 | 87 | 994 | 3mo |
|
Follow-up: What a statistical analysis plan adds that the paper does not
What a statistical analysis plan adds that the paper does not I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in…
|
2 | 7.2k | 3mo | |
|
Run-in periods and the population they select — the long version
Run-in periods and the population they select — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016). Please read…
|
2 | 8.9k | 4mo | |
|
[2026 update] Reading a supplementary appendix and finding the interesting part
On the subject in the title: Reading a supplementary appendix and finding the interesting part Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) with FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024)…
|
+39 | 44 | 8.2k | 5mo |
|
Non-inferiority margins: how they are chosen and how they are abused
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Non-inferiority margins: how they are chosen and how they are abused Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) with…
|
+42 | 46 | 10k | 5mo |
|
Sample size calculations, read backwards from the published number
Sample size calculations, read backwards from the published number Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016). Please…
|
2 | 8.1k | 6mo | |
|
How to read a forest plot, properly, from scratch
The question in the title: How to read a forest plot, properly, from scratch I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it before…
|
+73 | 81 | 17k | 7mo |
|
Coming back to: Sample size calculations, read backwards from the published number
On the subject in the title: Sample size calculations, read backwards from the published number Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before…
|
+82 | 88 | 1.8k | 11mo |
|
Comparators chosen for regulatory reasons rather than clinical ones — one year on
Comparators chosen for regulatory reasons rather than clinical ones — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023). Please read…
|
+82 | 87 | 1.1k | 12mo |
|
Interim analyses and stopping rules — does this still hold?
Interim analyses and stopping rules — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Comparing SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) with SURMOUNT-4 (…
|
+30 | 34 | 29k | 13mo |
|
Reading a trial's population section before its results — does this still hold?
Reading a trial's population section before its results — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med ,…
|
+140 | 154 | 5.4k | 14mo |
|
Comparators chosen for regulatory reasons rather than clinical ones
On the subject in the title: Comparators chosen for regulatory reasons rather than clinical ones Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022). Please read it before…
|
2 | 27k | 14mo | |
|
Follow-up: Open-label extensions: what survives and what does not
Open-label extensions: what survives and what does not — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) and…
|
+22 | 26 | 397 | 16mo |
|
[2026 update] How to read a forest plot, properly, from scratch
How to read a forest plot, properly, from scratch — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Session topic: SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024). Please read it before…
|
+49 | 53 | 643 | 19mo |
Sponsored
Janoshik Analytical — independent third-party testingHPLC purity and mass-spectrometric identity on submitted samples, reported with the method stated. The laboratory most often cited in this community’s verification records.Independent testing →
Sponsored
GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — synthesis, directFounded 1998. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, over 1,500 staff and 200-plus patents. Custom peptide synthesis and amino acid derivatives, with a batch certificate on every order.Custom synthesis →