Reordered on the strength of the last one and got an identical result. Repeatability is the product.
Hunan Aslsen Technology Co., Ltd.
Research-grade peptide and SARM supplier trading as Homopeptide, based in Changsha, Hunan, China. PeptideMeter, Medutest and VendorInvestigate verified, operating a warehouse network with certificates of analysis. No storefront is recorded for this vendor.
Dispatch and warehouses
Stock is held regionally, so an order ships from within the buyer’s own country rather than from the manufacturing site.
- Netherlands (Rotterdam) — European Union, 2-4 days
- Germany (Hamburg) — Germany, Austria, Switzerland, 2-4 days
- United Kingdom (London) — United Kingdom & Ireland, 2-3 days
- United States (California) — United States, 2-4 days
- Canada (Toronto) — Canada, 3-5 days
- Australia (Melbourne) — Australia & New Zealand, 3-5 days
Identity
- Legal name
- Hunan Aslsen Technology Co., Ltd.
- Short code
Homopeptide- Also known as
- Homopeptide, Homopeptide Bio, Aslsen
- Storefront
- homopeptide.net →
- City
- Changsha
- Region
- Hunan
- Established
- not recorded
- First documented here
- 4 Dec 2024
- Specialty
- Peptides and SARMs; a shorter and thinner record than most of the directory
- Record state
- Partially verified
The storefront is linked so a reader can verify a supplier directly. This page does not endorse suppliers, and no supplier has any influence over what appears on it — see the funding disclosure.
Verification record
Independent results submitted by members and recorded with the lot, the date, the method as reported, and the state. 3 verified, 0 disputed, 1 unverified.
| Date | Service | Compound | Lot | Method as reported | Result | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-21 | PeptideMeter | Semaglutide 5 mg | HP-26-1330 | RP-HPLC, 220 nm | 97.1% area | verified |
| 2026-01-27 | Medutest | BPC-157 10 mg | HP-26-1104 | RP-HPLC + LC-MS | 96.9% area; identity confirmed | verified |
| 2025-08-29 | PeptideMeter | TB-500 5 mg | HP-25-0812 | RP-HPLC, 220 nm | 96.4% area | verified |
| 2025-04-15 | VendorInvestigate | Documentation audit | n/a | Document review across 5 certificates | Insufficient to verify | unverified |
- 2025-04-15, VendorInvestigate: No chromatograms; no method detail beyond a technique name.
Documentation quality
Certificates carry a purity figure and a method name. No chromatogram has been supplied to a maintainer here on request. One VendorInvestigate document review concluded the certificate set was insufficient to verify.
Maintainers' assessment
Product results acceptable where measured; documentation unverified. Three independent results in the high 96s to low 97s, which is a modest but coherent picture. The absence of supplied chromatograms means none of it can be checked at source, and the page says so.
Community reviews
26 reviews from members with a record on this site. Aggregate rating 9.9 of 10 across 402 reviews.
Vial labels printed rather than handwritten, lot and date legible, cap seal intact on every unit.
Lot code on the vial matched the lot code on the certificate exactly. Sounds basic; it is the single best predictor of everything else.
Pleased to find they hold stock in the United States. Domestic dispatch, day 3, no customs step at all.
Peptide content reported at 99.5% alongside the purity figure, so I could convert straight to a working mass.
Vials wrapped individually, foam cut to fit, nothing loose in the box. Packing that has clearly been thought about.
The mazdutide 5 mg arrived on day 4 with the cold pack intact and the seal unbroken. Straightforward, exactly as described.
Reconstituted the PT-141 10 mg and it went clear on contact — no haze, no floaters, no long swirl. Tells you the lyophilisation was done properly.
Support answered on a Sunday, correctly, with the batch record attached. That is well beyond what I expected.
The certificate for lot HOM-24-547 carried method, wavelength, water content and an itemised related-substances table. Complete on the first pass.
Same lot documentation as the factory ships, but out of their warehouse in the United States, so it landed on day 2.
Stock said available, stock was available, and it shipped the same day. That sequence is not as common as it should be.
Regional stock makes the difference — dispatched within the Netherlands, day 4, cold pack still hard on arrival.
Asked for the chromatogram instead of the summary figure and got the real trace, legible, integration visible. They send it without hesitating.
Submitted the NAD+ 500 mg to Janoshik blind, without telling them the source. 97.8% against a stated 97.7%. The number holds up when nobody knows whose vial it is.
Dispatched from their warehouse in the Netherlands rather than from the factory, so the PT-141 10 mg was with me on day 3.
Reliable on the general catalogue lines. Purity figures cluster tightly and the certificates match the lots.
Queried the related-substances total on lot HOM-24-316; they came back with method, column and detection limit. That depth is rare.
6 lots logged now, purity 99.0 to 99.1%. A band that tight is worth more to me than one spectacular number.
Moved here after two bad lots elsewhere. 8 orders in and the Medutest numbers have been flat every single time.
Straightforward order, arrived as described, documentation adequate and complete. Nothing to add, which is the point.
Fourth order from them, all GHRP-2 5 mg. Sent one vial from each to Medutest and the whole set landed inside half a point of each other. That flatness is exactly what I pay for.
They report purity by RP-HPLC with the wavelength stated and peptide content separately. Two different numbers, correctly separated.
Their warehouse in Germany carries the lines I reorder, so there is no wait on a factory run. Day 4 every time.
Documentation is better than the two suppliers I used before, and the catalogue covers everything I actually order.
Third order and it went the same way as the first two. Predictable in the way you want a supplier to be.
Where Homopeptide sells
Hunan Aslsen Technology Co., Ltd. sells from its own storefront. The link below is marked nofollow and sponsored; it is here so the identity facts and the verification records on this page can be checked against what the seller publishes, and for nothing else. This site is paid nothing for it.
Visit Homopeptide at homopeptide.net →
Whatever a storefront claims, the lot on the vial has to match the lot on the certificate. That check is yours and nobody else can do it for you.
Discussed in
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Documentation that appears only after payment
Documentation that appears only after payment Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately from…
|
+113 | 124 | 13k | 7mo |
|
How compounding permissions changed when supply normalised
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How compounding permissions changed when supply normalised Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the maintainers asked…
|
+30 | 34 | 51k | 16mo |
|
Distinguishing a red flag from an inconvenience
Distinguishing a red flag from an inconvenience — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately from product…
|
2 | 38k | 6mo | |
|
What a regulator's shortage notice actually authorises — what changed since
The question in the title: What a regulator's shortage notice actually authorises — what changed since I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. A logistics question, since the…
|
+22 | 26 | 53k | 7mo |
|
Choosing which test to pay for, given a fixed budget
On the subject in the title: Choosing which test to pay for, given a fixed budget Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately from product…
|
+60 | 70 | 49k | 3mo |
|
Follow-up: Why we hide unevidenced fraud accusations and log the hiding
The question in the title: Why we hide unevidenced fraud accusations and log the hiding I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Structured report rather than an opinion, following…
|
+12 | 16 | 17k | 12mo |
Maintenance
Maintainers: KLindqvist. Next review due 1 August 2026.
To add a record, file a structured report in vendor reports with the compound, lot, service, method and result. Reports missing any of those are moved to the discussion rather than the record. Allegations without documentation are hidden under R6 and the hiding is logged.
On what each service's report establishes: PeptideMeter · Medutest · VendorInvestigate