Compounds · subcategory

Other compounds

Anything not covered by a dedicated subcategory, including research-use-only material with no human data.

22 topics1,436 posts7 solved Moderators: KLindqvist, j.mwangi About this category

research use only custom synthesis needs a source mislabelling

22 topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
About the Other compounds category research use only custom synthesis needs a source Pinned Wiki Closed Anything not covered by a dedicated subcategory, including research-use-only material with no human data. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is…	+8	12	51k	7mo
Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically — does this still hold? custom synthesis mislabelling needs a source research use only Solved Pinned Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically — does this still hold? Session topic: SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023). Please read…		2	309	9mo
Compounds this community declines to help with, and why — does this still hold? custom synthesis research use only mislabelling Compounds this community declines to help with, and why — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I have seen SCALE ( N Engl J Med ,…	+3	7	26k	7h
AOD-9604 and the fragment hypothesis, revisited — does this still hold? research use only needs a source mislabelling Solved The question in the title: AOD-9604 and the fragment hypothesis, revisited — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Comparing FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024)…	+7	11	31k	19h
Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically research use only custom synthesis needs a source mislabelling Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in…	+72	81	44k	1d
Why catalogue breadth is not evidence of anything research use only needs a source custom synthesis Under review Why catalogue breadth is not evidence of anything I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a claim I…		2	38k	2d
Naming conventions for research peptides and the confusion they cause custom synthesis mislabelling research use only needs a source Posting this under the heading it deserves: Naming conventions for research peptides and the confusion they cause Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) with STEP 1 ( N…	+21	25	4.9k	22d
Coming back to: Reading a supplier's product description as a marketing document needs a source custom synthesis research use only mislabelling Reading a supplier's product description as a marketing document Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in…	+35	39	688	5mo
AOD-9604 and the fragment hypothesis, revisited mislabelling research use only custom synthesis needs a source Posting this under the heading it deserves: AOD-9604 and the fragment hypothesis, revisited Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) with SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med…	+40	44	2.8k	6mo
Sequence verification for an obscure compound: how it is done — what changed since custom synthesis needs a source mislabelling On the subject in the title: Sequence verification for an obscure compound: how it is done — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please…	+100	108	1.3k	8mo
Reading a supplier's product description as a marketing document custom synthesis needs a source mislabelling On the subject in the title: Reading a supplier's product description as a marketing document Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019) cited in support of a claim I…	+86	97	62k	8mo
Compounds this community declines to help with, and why research use only needs a source mislabelling custom synthesis Solved Wiki Compounds this community declines to help with, and why — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) with SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) and…	+81	87	35k	10mo
Why catalogue breadth is not evidence of anything — what changed since custom synthesis mislabelling needs a source research use only Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why catalogue breadth is not evidence of anything — what changed since Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022). Please read it before…	+62	66	26k	10mo
Coming back to: When "no data" is the complete and final answer research use only needs a source custom synthesis When "no data" is the complete and final answer I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a claim I…	+77	82	12k	11mo
How to research a compound with no human data without deceiving yourself needs a source mislabelling custom synthesis research use only Solved Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How to research a compound with no human data without deceiving yourself Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before posting; the…	+107	119	11k	12mo
Sequence verification for an obscure compound: how it is done needs a source custom synthesis research use only mislabelling Sequence verification for an obscure compound: how it is done Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) with SURMOUNT-1 ( N…	+104	114	10k	12mo
Second pass at: How to research a compound with no human data without deceiving yourself research use only custom synthesis needs a source mislabelling Second pass at: How to research a compound with no human data without deceiving yourself Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med ,…	+64	71	2.5k	13mo
When "no data" is the complete and final answer custom synthesis mislabelling needs a source research use only Solved Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: When "no data" is the complete and final answer I have seen SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…	+154	165	6.3k	15mo
Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically — a second dataset research use only mislabelling needs a source custom synthesis Solved Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) with SURPASS-2 (…	+109	125	2k	16mo
Revisiting: Melanocortin agonists: mechanism and the documented adverse profile custom synthesis mislabelling research use only Solved Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Melanocortin agonists: mechanism and the documented adverse profile Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024) with…	+119	141	22k	20mo
Melanocortin agonists: mechanism and the documented adverse profile needs a source mislabelling research use only custom synthesis Melanocortin agonists: mechanism and the documented adverse profile — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) with SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) and…	+7	11	5.5k	20mo
Naming conventions for research peptides and the confusion they cause — one year on research use only mislabelling needs a source Naming conventions for research peptides and the confusion they cause — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) cited in…	+1	5	181	2y

Sponsored Sigma-Aldrich — certified reference materialsReference standards, analytical reagents and certified materials for method calibration. If you are validating a method, this is where the standard comes from.Reference standards →