This follows post #88 rather than contradicting it.
Lurking first: if you want to introduce yourself after lurking a bit, that is fine. You do not have to introduce yourself before your first technical post either.
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
This follows post #88 rather than contradicting it.
Lurking first: if you want to introduce yourself after lurking a bit, that is fine. You do not have to introduce yourself before your first technical post either.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
Ongoing: you can post multiple introductions over time. If you return after a long break, reintroducing yourself is fine.
No spam: introductions are not a place to advertise commercial products or services. That is a rules violation.
Picking up post #92: that is the part I would want checked first.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Say hello. No question required. Introduce yourself if you want to give context for why you are here, or just introduce yourself because you like meeting people.
I read post #98 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Welcome: the response to introductions is usually welcome. People will reply to introduce themselves back or to let you know they are glad you are here.
This follows post #98 rather than contradicting it.
Ongoing: you can post multiple introductions over time. If you return after a long break, reintroducing yourself is fine.
Privacy: share only what you are comfortable making permanent and public. An introduction is archived and searchable; do not include information you will later regret posting.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Long-time reader, first-time poster
On the subject in the title: Long-time reader, first-time poster Working notes rather than a conclusion. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim. Something adjacent…
|
+15 | 19 | 2.5k | 8mo |
|
Joined after a search result and stayed
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Joined after a search result and stayed Everything below is what sits behind that. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
|
+5 | 9 | 26k | 7h |
|
Revisiting: Joined after a search result and stayed
Revisiting: Joined after a search result and stayed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a…
|
2 | 1.6k | 22mo | |
|
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — does this still hold? Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a…
|
+1 | 5 | 35k | 19mo |
|
About the Introductions category
Say hello. No question required. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a note. If the scope described here has drifted…
|
4 | 2.3k | 23mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour — the long version
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Question in the title. Context below, and I…
|
+129 | 142 | 49k | 8mo |
|
Discussing something you have already been doing — the long version
Discussing something you have already been doing — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The…
|
+14 | 18 | 58k | 12mo |
|
Asking about a compound your prescriber has not heard of
Asking about a compound your prescriber has not heard of Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I…
|
+137 | 148 | 15k | 11mo |
|
Introducing myself: pharmacist, sceptic, reluctant participant — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Introducing myself: pharmacist, sceptic, reluctant participant — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule…
|
+101 | 107 | 14k | 4mo |
|
Revisiting: Joined after a search result and stayed
Revisiting: Joined after a search result and stayed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a…
|
2 | 1.6k | 22mo |