Cost per milligram is the only comparison that survives format differences, but even then it needs care. A pen and a vial are not the same product and cannot be compared on price per milligram alone because dead volume, wastage, and number of doses actually obtainable differ.
List price versus negotiated price versus what you pay posts 91–116
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Biosimilars and future generics: as patents expire, biosimilar and generic versions might become available and prices might fall. That has already happened for some proteins; incretin agonist pricing might follow.
Coming back to post #91, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Compute cost per delivered dose at your dose if you want a number you can act on. That requires knowing your dose, vial volume, and whether you are using a vial or a pen.
Discount programmes and coupons: manufacturers often offer coupons that reduce out-of-pocket costs if insurance is not covering or is covering at a high copay. These have eligibility restrictions but can save money.
Price variation between pharmacies: identical prescriptions can cost different amounts at different pharmacies because pharmacies negotiate individually with insurers and manufacturers.
This follows post #95 rather than contradicting it.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
On post #95 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
International pricing: the same compound costs very different amounts in different countries because healthcare systems and regulatory frameworks differ. Generally, US prices are higher than other developed nations.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Coming back to post #99, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Biosimilars and future generics: as patents expire, biosimilar and generic versions might become available and prices might fall. That has already happened for some proteins; incretin agonist pricing might follow.
Picking up post #99: that is the part I would want checked first.
Price variation between pharmacies: identical prescriptions can cost different amounts at different pharmacies because pharmacies negotiate individually with insurers and manufacturers.
Discount programmes and coupons: manufacturers often offer coupons that reduce out-of-pocket costs if insurance is not covering or is covering at a high copay. These have eligibility restrictions but can save money.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
This follows post #103 rather than contradicting it.
Compute cost per delivered dose at your dose if you want a number you can act on. That requires knowing your dose, vial volume, and whether you are using a vial or a pen.
Worth separating two things that post #103 runs together.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
Pharmacy acquisition cost: a pharmacy pays less than the patient pays, even at insurance rates. That margin is where the pharmacy's costs and profit live.
Subscription services and subscriptions: some online clinics bundle compounds into subscription models with different pricing. Understanding the terms before committing matters.
post #110 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Insurance tier placement: a compound might be covered but on a higher tier (higher copay). Moving to a lower tier usually requires prior authorization or documented failure of cheaper alternatives.
Worth separating two things that post #108 runs together.
Cost per milligram is the only comparison that survives format differences, but even then it needs care. A pen and a vial are not the same product and cannot be compared on price per milligram alone because dead volume, wastage, and number of doses actually obtainable differ.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
post #114 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Insurance tier placement: a compound might be covered but on a higher tier (higher copay). Moving to a lower tier usually requires prior authorization or documented failure of cheaper alternatives.
Cost per milligram is the only comparison that survives format differences, but even then it needs care. A pen and a vial are not the same product and cannot be compared on price per milligram alone because dead volume, wastage, and number of doses actually obtainable differ.
This topic was referenced in
- Cost per delivered dose, which is the number that mattersAccess › Pricing · 59 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cost per milligram, computed honestly across formats — the long version
Cost per milligram, computed honestly across formats — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A coverage question with the paperwork detail…
|
+111 | 124 | 24k | 14mo |
|
Cost per milligram, computed honestly across formats
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Cost per milligram, computed honestly across formats Everything below is what sits behind that. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this…
|
2 | 47k | 18mo | |
|
Revisiting: List price versus negotiated price versus what you pay
Revisiting: List price versus negotiated price versus what you pay — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is…
|
+24 | 28 | 50k | 12mo |
|
Pen wastage and its effect on real cost — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Pen wastage and its effect on real cost — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in…
|
2 | 34k | 13mo | |
|
Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules
On the subject in the title: Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules Working notes rather than a conclusion. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category…
|
+37 | 42 | 32k | 11d |
Related topics — sharing the tags formulary, data table, compounding
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+58 | 63 | 1k | 19mo |
|
What a reversed-phase purity number actually is
The question in the title: What a reversed-phase purity number actually is I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat…
|
+87 | 101 | 27k | 4h |
|
How shortages have affected compounding permissions
How shortages have affected compounding permissions I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that…
|
+61 | 71 | 3.6k | 2d |
|
Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method…
|
+32 | 37 | 7.4k | 3mo |
|
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
|
3 | 24k | 9mo |