Chronic kidney disease: compounds in this class have renal benefit in people with kidney disease. The benefit appears to be additive to other renal-protective agents, not a replacement for them.
Osteoarthritis and mechanical versus metabolic improvement — one year on posts 31–57
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Picking up post #29: that is the part I would want checked first.
Hepatic steatosis and MASH: a phase 2 trial in semaglutide for steatohepatitis showed resolution was more frequent on treatment. Histological resolution is a surrogate for long-term clinical outcomes like cirrhosis.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
Type 2 diabetes: the population with the largest evidence base for these compounds. The SURPASS and SUSTAIN programmes established glycaemic benefit. The renal and cardiovascular benefit evidence is separate from the glycaemic benefit evidence.
I read post #33 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Interactions between comorbidities: diabetes and kidney disease together change the risk calculation for hypoglycemia and for medication clearance. They are not independent variables.
This follows post #33 rather than contradicting it.
Multiple comorbidities: a person with diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease is outside the studied populations in most trials. Extrapolating to that person requires reasoning from the individual component trials and mechanisms.
Bariatric surgery history: altered anatomy after surgery affects absorption. That matters for oral medications and for reconstituted solutions. Discussing specific medications and doses with a clinician familiar with bariatric surgery is prudent.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Coming back to post #37, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
PCOS and metabolic overlap: polycystic ovary syndrome has metabolic overlap with obesity and insulin resistance. Data on compounds in this class in PCOS specifically is thin; most discussion is by mechanism.
post #42 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Obstructive sleep apnoea: SURMOUNT-OSA used an objective endpoint, the apnoea-hypopnoea index. Reduction was substantial. Whether the benefit is weight loss or a direct drug effect is not resolved by the trial.
Worth separating two things that post #40 runs together.
Cardiovascular disease: several compounds have cardiovascular outcome trials. SELECT was in people without diabetes; SUSTAIN 6 was in high-risk diabetes. Absolute benefit is largest in high-risk people.
Comorbidity control: if a comorbidity (high blood pressure, high lipids) is not adequately controlled, the decision about adding compounds in this class depends on the current control status, not on the compound alone.
Type 2 diabetes: the population with the largest evidence base for these compounds. The SURPASS and SUSTAIN programmes established glycaemic benefit. The renal and cardiovascular benefit evidence is separate from the glycaemic benefit evidence.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Multiple comorbidities: a person with diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease is outside the studied populations in most trials. Extrapolating to that person requires reasoning from the individual component trials and mechanisms.
On post #44 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Interactions between comorbidities: diabetes and kidney disease together change the risk calculation for hypoglycemia and for medication clearance. They are not independent variables.
This follows post #46 rather than contradicting it.
Hepatic steatosis and MASH: a phase 2 trial in semaglutide for steatohepatitis showed resolution was more frequent on treatment. Histological resolution is a surrogate for long-term clinical outcomes like cirrhosis.
I read post #48 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Chronic kidney disease: compounds in this class have renal benefit in people with kidney disease. The benefit appears to be additive to other renal-protective agents, not a replacement for them.
Bariatric surgery history: altered anatomy after surgery affects absorption. That matters for oral medications and for reconstituted solutions. Discussing specific medications and doses with a clinician familiar with bariatric surgery is prudent.
PCOS and metabolic overlap: polycystic ovary syndrome has metabolic overlap with obesity and insulin resistance. Data on compounds in this class in PCOS specifically is thin; most discussion is by mechanism.
Interactions between comorbidities: diabetes and kidney disease together change the risk calculation for hypoglycemia and for medication clearance. They are not independent variables.
This follows post #51 rather than contradicting it.
Multiple comorbidities: a person with diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease is outside the studied populations in most trials. Extrapolating to that person requires reasoning from the individual component trials and mechanisms.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Coming back to post #55, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Cardiovascular disease: several compounds have cardiovascular outcome trials. SELECT was in people without diabetes; SUSTAIN 6 was in high-risk diabetes. Absolute benefit is largest in high-risk people.
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hypertension improvement and when medication needs revisiting
Hypertension improvement and when medication needs revisiting Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The…
|
+74 | 79 | 1.1k | 10mo |
|
Revisiting: PCOS and metabolic overlap: what is and is not studied
Revisiting: PCOS and metabolic overlap: what is and is not studied — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The published…
|
+55 | 59 | 26k | 2d |
|
Cardiovascular risk: reading the outcome trials as a set
Cardiovascular risk: reading the outcome trials as a set Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The published…
|
4 | 12k | 5mo | |
|
Chronic kidney disease and the FLOW result
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Chronic kidney disease and the FLOW result Everything below is what sits behind that. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I know the…
|
+34 | 38 | 33k | 23mo |
|
Chronic kidney disease and the FLOW result — a second dataset
Chronic kidney disease and the FLOW result — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. General question, not a request for advice about my own care —…
|
2 | 2.3k | 20mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags chronic kidney disease, MASH / hepatic steatosis, obstructive sleep apnoea
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Second pass at: Pregnancy and pregnancy planning: contraindication and washout
Second pass at: Pregnancy and pregnancy planning: contraindication and washout Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about a population rather than about a…
|
+111 | 127 | 1.6k | 6mo |
|
How much fluid is actually needed, and how you would know
The question in the title: How much fluid is actually needed, and how you would know I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this…
|
+11 | 15 | 53k | 2mo |
|
Sleep tracking data and its considerable limitations
Sleep tracking data and its considerable limitations — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The published trials in this…
|
+109 | 126 | 61k | 9mo |
|
Why semaglutide solutions can look faintly opalescent and when that matters
The question in the title: Why semaglutide solutions can look faintly opalescent and when that matters I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Comparing LEADER ( N Engl J Med ,…
|
+73 | 79 | 2k | 4mo |
|
Second pass at: Sleep apnoea improving and the equipment implications
On the subject in the title: Second pass at: Sleep apnoea improving and the equipment implications Working notes rather than a conclusion. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I know…
|
+89 | 96 | 1.1k | 10h |