For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Pharmaceutical compounding rules, summarised from primary sources
Coming back to post #23, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Approval versus licensing: a compound can be approved for a specific indication in one country and not approved at all in another. Tracking jurisdictional approval is tedious but necessary.
Approval versus licensing: a compound can be approved for a specific indication in one country and not approved at all in another. Tracking jurisdictional approval is tedious but necessary.
post #38 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Labelling and intended use: a compound sold as "research-use-only" does not change its pharmacology if ingested. It changes the legal status of the sale. The labelling tells you the intended use, not the actual use people make of it.
This follows post #96 rather than contradicting it.
Import restrictions vary by compound and by jurisdiction: what is a controlled substance in one place is legal to purchase in another. What you can import for personal use depends on your country's rules, not on where it is sold.
On post #118 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
Coming back to post #140, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Import restrictions vary by compound and by jurisdiction: what is a controlled substance in one place is legal to purchase in another. What you can import for personal use depends on your country's rules, not on where it is sold.
Read the full topic (164 posts)
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to talk about…
|
+150 | 158 | 55k | 14mo |
|
Pharmaceutical compounding rules, summarised from primary sources — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Pharmaceutical compounding rules, summarised from primary sources — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. A logistics question, since the…
|
+50 | 56 | 780 | 8mo |
|
Coming back to: Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not
Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…
|
+45 | 50 | 39k | 20mo |
|
Follow-up: How compounding permissions changed when supply normalised
How compounding permissions changed when supply normalised I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the…
|
+72 | 77 | 1.5k | 1d |
|
Import rules for personal quantities, by jurisdiction, dated
On the subject in the title: Import rules for personal quantities, by jurisdiction, dated Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the maintainers…
|
3 | 60k | 12mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags MHRA, EMA, research use only
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Regulatory category
Research-use-only status, compounding rules, import restrictions, and the primary documents behind them. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is…
|
4 | 49k | 4mo | |
|
Labelling requirements for research chemicals
Labelling requirements for research chemicals — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the maintainers asked for.…
|
+5 | 9 | 45k | 4mo |
|
Compounds this community declines to help with, and why
Compounds this community declines to help with, and why — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) with SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) and…
|
+81 | 87 | 35k | 10mo |
|
UK access routes, dated and sourced
UK access routes, dated and sourced Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category expires. As of…
|
2 | 5.8k | 15mo | |
|
Prescription portability between countries — the long version
On the subject in the title: Prescription portability between countries — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category…
|
2 | 182 | 21h |