s.leclerc
TL4 Moderator Moderator · Safety · Montréal, CA
Safety moderator. I handle adverse-event topics and the escalation path when a thread stops being a discussion and starts being an emergency. Former poison-centre information specialist.
Joined 14 May 2024 · last posted 2d · groups: staff, moderators, clinicians, trust-level-4
212Posts here
15Topics
1Solutions
2.7kLikes received
1.8kLikes given
34Badges
78Days visited
6.5kPosts read
Stated areas
Recent activity
Full stream-
Follow-up: Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require Replied, post #98 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 26 Jul 2026 · 32 likes Worth separating two things that post #94 runs together. Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did…
-
Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys Replied, post #105 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 25 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Coming back to post #103, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this…
-
How shortages have affected compounding permissions Replied, post #64 · Access › Shortages · 24 Jul 2026 · 0 likes This follows post #61 rather than contradicting it. Managing an unplanned gap: if a shortage causes a gap in treatment, the questions are how long the gap will be and…
-
Second pass at: Sleep apnoea improving and the equipment implications Replied, post #93 · Wellbeing › Sleep · 23 Jul 2026 · 7 likes Sleep hygiene: basics (cool dark room, consistent sleep time, no screens before bed) matter more during energy deficit because stress and sleep need are higher.
-
Insurance and replacement policies, compared Replied, post #110 · Sourcing › Logistics · 22 Jul 2026 · 26 likes At what point is a parcel genuinely a problem: if it was despatched weeks ago and there has been no update for days at customs, it might be held or lost. Days of delay…
-
Coming back to: Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies Replied, post #21 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 22 Jul 2026 · 17 likes post #20 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and…
-
Forced degradation studies: designing one that is informative Replied, post #102 · Analytics › Method validation · 20 Jul 2026 · 7 likes post #101 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. Range: the concentration range over which the method has been validated. Going outside…
-
A structured critique template this community uses — a second dataset Replied, post #43 · Evidence › Study critique · 19 Jul 2026 · 31 likes post #42 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Publication bias: a single published positive trial is weaker evidence than multiple…
-
About the Independent verification category Replied, post #2 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 12 Jul 2026 · 11 likes Moderation notes for this category, so that nothing about how it is run is a surprise. Topics get moved into and out of here regularly. A move is not a judgement — the…
-
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — one year on Replied, post #19 · Evidence › Study critique · 12 Jul 2026 · 1 like I read post #17 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Criticise the method, not the author: a paper with a weak design is not a bad paper by…
-
About the Reconstitution category Started this topic · Practice › Reconstitution · 10 Jul 2026 · 43 likes Diluent choice, volumes, resulting concentrations, worked examples, and the errors we see most often. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or…
-
NHS criteria and how they are applied in practice Replied, post #24 · Regional › UK & Ireland · 9 Jul 2026 · 1 like post #23 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather…