The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Meta · Feature requests · continued

Request: a per-category review queue posts 121–137

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

N
NicolaidesTL3Regular22 Jul 2026#121

Tracking: staff will update the status of feature requests (under consideration, planned, implemented, declined). Checking back lets you know the fate of your suggestion.

2 likes 6d
GT
g.tammTL2 Moderator22 Jul 2026#122
buffer_margin, post #15: post #14 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Duplicate requests: if several people request the same feature, the requests often get merged. Check whether your feature has already been suggested before posting. Go to post

Requests for platform and documentation features, with the reasoning that justifies them. If you think the site would be better with a feature, suggest it with enough detail that it is actionable.

8 likes in reply to #15 6d
SG
s.grigorescuTL2Member22 Jul 2026#123

post #122 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Deprecation requests: if you think a feature should be removed or changed, that is also a request. Explain why you think it would improve the site.

26 likes 6d
WV
w.verhoevenTL2 Moderator23 Jul 2026 · edited#124

Two things before anyone answers the substance.

First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.

0 likes 5d
LM
lyophil_marginTL3Regular23 Jul 2026#125

Use case: explain why you think the feature would help. "I would use this to..." makes the request concrete.

4 likes 5d
HK
h.krastevTL2 Moderator24 Jul 2026#126
r.coelho, post #3: Coming back to the opening post, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. Requests for platform and documentation features, with the reasoning that justifies them. If you think the site would be better with a feature, suggest it with enough detail that it is actionable. Go to post

Alternatives: if you have thought of a way the current site might already serve your need, mention it. It helps assess whether the feature is truly missing or just not obvious.

13 likes in reply to #3 4d
N
NorringtonTL3Regular24 Jul 2026#127

post #126 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

0 likes 4d
EK
e.kuipersTL2 Moderator24 Jul 2026#128

On post #124 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.

Duplicate requests: if several people request the same feature, the requests often get merged. Check whether your feature has already been suggested before posting.

0 likes 4d
D
DSakamotoTL3Regular25 Jul 2026#129
j.baptista, post #14: I read post #12 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Community support: if other people support your request, they can reply with "+1" or "I would use that too". Widely-requested features are prioritised. Go to post

This follows post #126 rather than contradicting it.

Duplicate requests: if several people request the same feature, the requests often get merged. Check whether your feature has already been suggested before posting.

7 likes in reply to #14 3d
ZN
z.nakamuraTL2 Moderator25 Jul 2026#130

Two things before anyone answers the substance.

First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.

18 likes 3d
BR
buffer_reviewTL325 Jul 2026#131
AC
a.cardosoTL2 Moderator26 Jul 2026#132

Tracking: staff will update the status of feature requests (under consideration, planned, implemented, declined). Checking back lets you know the fate of your suggestion.

22 likes 2d
CD
cannula_driftTL3Regular26 Jul 2026#133
DSakamoto, post #129: This follows post #126 rather than contradicting it. Duplicate requests: if several people request the same feature, the requests often get merged. Check whether your feature has already been suggested before posting. Go to post

I read post #131 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Feature scope: some requests are for the site itself (search, filtering, navigation). Some are for the documentation (new topics, different formats). Scope helps prioritise.

6 likes in reply to #129 2d
SV
sa.vogelTL2 Moderator27 Jul 2026#134
h.nicolaides, post #100: Effort estimation: some features are trivial to implement; others are substantial work. Staff will estimate effort when assessing whether a feature is feasible. Go to post

Use case: explain why you think the feature would help. "I would use this to..." makes the request concrete.

1 like in reply to #100 1d
AD
ambient_draftTL3Regular27 Jul 2026#135

Community support: if other people support your request, they can reply with "+1" or "I would use that too". Widely-requested features are prioritised.

30 likes 21h
KA
k.adeyemiTL2 Moderator27 Jul 2026#136

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

15 likes 11h
L
LJankowiakTL3Regular28 Jul 2026 · edited#137

Coming back to post #135, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

Deprecation requests: if you think a feature should be removed or changed, that is also a request. Explain why you think it would improve the site.

3 likes 2h

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Request: show the solution author in the topic list — what changed since
Request: show the solution author in the topic list — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation…
KDNJHRONT+85 91 20k 3mo
Request: export my own posts — one year on
Request: export my own posts — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps…
BNDSSZBWIG+66 70 14k 4mo
Request: export my own posts
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Request: export my own posts Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question…
SCAFCV 2 57k 6mo
Follow-up: Request: a per-category review queue
On the subject in the title: Request: a per-category review queue Working notes rather than a conclusion. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps being…
ALZDN 2 14k 4mo
About the Feature requests category
Requests for platform and documentation features, with the reasoning that justifies them. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
TVJMFLAWPP 4 28k 9mo

Related topics — sharing the tags site feedback, translation, wiki post

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
What to include when your question involves a chromatogram — one year on
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What to include when your question involves a chromatogram — one year on Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the…
HKCETVNKO+69 75 862 14d
Request: show the solution author in the topic list
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Request: show the solution author in the topic list Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons.…
KGPNB 2 2.4k 10mo
Second pass at: Asking a follow-up: new topic or new reply?
The question in the title: Second pass at: Asking a follow-up: new topic or new reply? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I want to check my reasoning rather than get a…
JBTBTWEKSE 4 81 8mo
Request: a diff view for wiki revisions
Request: a diff view for wiki revisions — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps…
MHJCFSMT+26 30 3.1k 19mo
Coming back to: What happens when a maintainer goes quiet
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What happens when a maintainer goes quiet Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the trust-level page and I…
SCMSHNOWM+6 10 400 10mo