a.cardoso
TL2 Moderator · Braga
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Braga.
Joined 18 September 2025 · last posted 2d
84Posts here
2Topics
1Solutions
1.2kLikes received
2kLikes given
22Badges
210Days visited
4.6kPosts read
Recent activity
Full stream-
Request: a per-category review queue Replied, post #132 · Meta › Feature requests · 26 Jul 2026 · 22 likes Tracking: staff will update the status of feature requests (under consideration, planned, implemented, declined). Checking back lets you know the fate of your suggestion.
-
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — does this… Replied, post #10 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 25 Jul 2026 · 17 likes Picking up post #7: that is the part I would want checked first. I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than…
-
Reading a rodent study on a secretagogue without over-extrapolating — the long version Replied, post #59 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 24 Jul 2026 · 3 likes GHRH analogues versus ghrelin mimetics are often conflated but they are different mechanisms. GHRH analogues (like CJC-1295) cause the pituitary to release growth…
-
Priming a pen and whether the primed volume is wasted Replied, post #15 · Devices › Pens & autoinjectors · 20 Jul 2026 · 13 likes Dose counters: pens show the remaining number of doses. When the counter reaches zero, the pen is empty and cannot deliver more. Noting the counter before injection…
-
How shortages have affected compounding permissions — does this still hold? Replied, post #28 · Access › Shortages · 19 Jul 2026 · 22 likes Allocation and rationing: during severe shortages, suppliers might ration allocation to prescribers. Understanding rationing policies from your prescriber matters for…
-
GHRH analogues versus ghrelin mimetics: different mechanisms, conflated discussion Replied, post #46 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 17 Jul 2026 · 6 likes Coming back to post #44, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. What a well-designed human trial of a secretagogue would look like: randomised,…
-
An 18-month record including the parts that went badly Replied, post #70 · Outcomes › Progress reports · 15 Jul 2026 · 0 likes This follows post #67 rather than contradicting it. Medication changes: escalating dose, or adding or removing other medications, can affect the rate of weight loss.…
-
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — one year on Replied, post #17 · Evidence › Study critique · 11 Jul 2026 · 18 likes Publication bias: a single published positive trial is weaker evidence than multiple published trials with consistent results. Asking whether there are unpublished…
-
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Replied, post #59 · Evidence › Journal club · 6 Jul 2026 · 23 likes Critical appraisal template: (1) What did the trial set out to estimate? (2) Could the design answer that question? (3) Was the population sufficiently similar to your…
-
Revisiting: The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Replied, post #96 · Sourcing › Vendor reports · 5 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Blind submission is worth the effort: have someone else relabel the sample so neither you nor the laboratory knows which supplier it came from until the result is back.…
-
Receptor desensitisation as a tolerance hypothesis, and its weak evidence Replied, post #26 · Pharmacology › Receptor biology · 24 Jun 2026 · 19 likes Picking up post #23: that is the part I would want checked first. Amylin receptor signalling: amylin promotes satiety and slows gastric emptying through a receptor…
-
Why we ask for units every single time, with three examples of what goes wrong Replied, post #67 · Start Here › How to Ask · 24 Jun 2026 · 1 like post #66 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Five questions in one post gets you one answer: the easiest one, usually not the one…