The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Progressive overload when the scale is falling

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 9, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
GL
glossary_lineTL1Member2 Mar 2025#1

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Progressive overload when the scale is falling Everything below is what sits behind that.

Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method is not a measurement.

Same scale, same time of day, same conditions, 55 weeks. I have also recorded protein intake and resistance-training sessions, both self-reported and both therefore optimistic.

The reason I am posting is a pattern in the middle of the series that I cannot explain and that I suspect is measurement rather than signal.

12 likes 17mo
IW
i.wojcikTL2 Moderator23 Apr 2025#2

Adaptation and plateau: if strength does not change for weeks, that is stability, not backsliding. Expecting continuous progress during weight loss is unrealistic.

16 likes 15mo
CO
c.okaforTL3Regular3 Aug 2025#5
bench_entry, post #3: Frequency: three sessions per week of full-body training is easier to maintain than higher frequencies on an energy deficit. Consistency beats intensity when recovery capacity is limited. Go to post

post #4 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Post-weight-loss training: once weight loss is complete and energy deficit ends, training can shift to building again. The transition from preservation mode to building mode is real and worth planning.

10 likes in reply to #3 12mo
KA
k.asanteTL2 Moderator1 Sep 2025 · edited#6
c.okafor, post #5: post #4 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Post-weight-loss training: once weight loss is complete and energy deficit ends, training can shift to building again. The transition from preservation mode to building mode is real and worth planning. Go to post

Programming while losing weight quickly: realistic expectations are crucial. Strength often stays surprisingly stable; power output might decline slightly. Expecting gains during an energy deficit sets yourself up for disappointment.

22 likes in reply to #5 11mo
ND
n.duarteTL2 Moderator26 Oct 2025#8

Deload weeks: periodic weeks (every 4 to 8 weeks) with reduced volume and intensity can help with recovery and sometimes reveal strength gains that got obscured by fatigue.

3 likes 9mo

Read the full topic (9 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…
ENLOPMDBJS+152 167 6.6k 21mo
Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports
On the subject in the title: Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports Working notes rather than a conclusion. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method…
BKCKKKEL+27 31 22k 20mo
About the Resistance training category
Programming while losing weight quickly, realistic expectations, and recovery. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a…
SLKAICRJM 4 40k 17d
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly — does this still hold?
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Maintenance rather than loss,…
GFIBT 2 11k 10mo
Training through a dose escalation week
Training through a dose escalation week — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes about. I have…
KJFYMHEST 4 42k 20mo

Related topics — sharing the tags fatigue, DXA, lean mass loss

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports
On the subject in the title: Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports Working notes rather than a conclusion. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method…
BKCKKKEL+27 31 22k 20mo
What I would record differently if I started again
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What I would record differently if I started again Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes about. I have…
MICLVK 2 12k 5mo
Second pass at: Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary tale
Second pass at: Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary tale Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the…
NLPNVOLBV+1 5 34k 8mo
Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method…
BJAVTKPNRV+32 37 7.4k 3mo
Shakes versus food: a pragmatic assessment
Shakes versus food: a pragmatic assessment Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes…
DBPAKTSTM+22 26 53k 20h