This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
Scope creep: if you think a page is attempting too much and should be split into multiple pages, that is a reasonable suggestion.
Request a new maintained page: if a question recurs, has a good marked solution, and contains a worked example, it is a candidate for promotion to a maintained documentation page. Post your nomination in this subcategory with a link to the topic.
This follows post #32 rather than contradicting it.
Correction requests: if you spot an error in a maintained page, note it here with the specific correction. The maintainer will review and update if justified.
Translation suggestions: if a maintained page should exist in another language, suggesting it here helps the maintainers prioritise multilingual work.
Cross-referencing: if you notice two pages that should reference each other but do not, suggest the cross-reference.
Coming back to post #38, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Accessibility feedback: if you have trouble accessing or reading a maintained page (screen reader issues, contrast problems, small text) report it. Accessibility matters.
I read post #39 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.
This follows post #39 rather than contradicting it.
Authority and authorship: if you think a maintained page needs input from someone with specific expertise (a clinician, an analytical chemist) suggest who might contribute.
Suggesting content for a page: if you know a maintained page is missing something important, post a suggestion with specific content you think should be added.
Coming back to post #43, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Cross-referencing: if you notice two pages that should reference each other but do not, suggest the cross-reference.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
Scope creep: if you think a page is attempting too much and should be split into multiple pages, that is a reasonable suggestion.
post #47 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Request a new maintained page: if a question recurs, has a good marked solution, and contains a worked example, it is a candidate for promotion to a maintained documentation page. Post your nomination in this subcategory with a link to the topic.
On post #48 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.
Cross-referencing: if you notice two pages that should reference each other but do not, suggest the cross-reference.
Scope creep: if you think a page is attempting too much and should be split into multiple pages, that is a reasonable suggestion.
Worth separating two things that post #52 runs together.
Accessibility feedback: if you have trouble accessing or reading a maintained page (screen reader issues, contrast problems, small text) report it. Accessibility matters.
Correction requests: if you spot an error in a maintained page, note it here with the specific correction. The maintainer will review and update if justified.
post #58 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Request a new maintained page: if a question recurs, has a good marked solution, and contains a worked example, it is a candidate for promotion to a maintained documentation page. Post your nomination in this subcategory with a link to the topic.
Suggesting content for a page: if you know a maintained page is missing something important, post a suggestion with specific content you think should be added.