Their warehouse in the United Kingdom carries the lines I reorder, so there is no wait on a factory run. Day 4 every time.
Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Research compound manufacturer trading as SGN (sangonbio.com), based in Shanghai, China, established 2004. Janoshik-tested and verified by Medutest, PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate; supplies peptides, SARMs, injectable oils and raw materials with certificates of analysis.
Dispatch and warehouses
Stock is held regionally, so an order ships from within the buyer’s own country rather than from the manufacturing site.
- Netherlands (Rotterdam) — European Union, 2-4 days
- Germany (Hamburg) — Germany, Austria, Switzerland, 2-4 days
- United Kingdom (London) — United Kingdom & Ireland, 2-3 days
- United States (California) — United States, 2-4 days
- Canada (Toronto) — Canada, 3-5 days
- Australia (Melbourne) — Australia & New Zealand, 3-5 days
Identity
- Legal name
- Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
- Short code
SGN- Also known as
- SGN, SGN Biotech, Sangon Biotech (Shanghai)
- Storefront
- sangonbio.com →
- City
- Shanghai
- Region
- Shanghai
- Established
- 2004
- First documented here
- 30 Jul 2024
- Specialty
- Broad life-science catalogue; peptides are one line among many
- Record state
- Verified
The storefront is linked so a reader can verify a supplier directly. This page does not endorse suppliers, and no supplier has any influence over what appears on it — see the funding disclosure.
Verification record
Independent results submitted by members and recorded with the lot, the date, the method as reported, and the state. 4 verified, 0 disputed, 0 unverified.
| Date | Service | Compound | Lot | Method as reported | Result | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-08 | Janoshik | Semaglutide 5 mg | SGN-B2606-19 | RP-HPLC, 214 nm | 98.4% area | verified |
| 2026-03-24 | Medutest | BPC-157 5 mg | SGN-B2603-77 | RP-HPLC, 220 nm | 98.9% area | verified |
| 2025-12-16 | PeptideMeter | Tirzepatide 10 mg | SGN-B2512-41 | RP-HPLC + LC-MS | 97.8% area; identity confirmed | verified |
| 2025-08-27 | VendorInvestigate | Documentation audit | n/a | Document review across 12 certificates | Complete but non-standard layout | verified |
- 2026-06-08, Janoshik: Water content 3.1% by Karl Fischer on the supplier certificate.
Documentation quality
Documentation follows a general life-science reagent format rather than a peptide-specific one, which means the fields you want are present but arranged unhelpfully. Water content by Karl Fischer is reported more often than by any other supplier here.
Maintainers' assessment
Verified. The broad catalogue cuts both ways: mature quality systems, but peptide-specific documentation conventions are weaker than at the dedicated houses.
Community reviews
26 reviews from members with a record on this site. Aggregate rating 9.6 of 10 across 994 reviews.
Ordered on a Monday from their warehouse in the United States and it was here by day 4. That is the whole case for regional stock.
Arrived on day 4 against a quoted 4. Customs paperwork was right first time, which is why it moved that fast.
Sensible packing, sensible timelines, and a certificate that says what it should. No notes.
Queried the related-substances total on lot SGN-26-411; they came back with method, column and detection limit. That depth is rare.
Third order and it went the same way as the first two. Predictable in the way you want a supplier to be.
Support answered on a Sunday, correctly, with the batch record attached. That is well beyond what I expected.
Costed them per mg against three other suppliers on the same tesamorelin 2 mg spec. Competitive on price and clearly ahead on documentation.
Domestic dispatch from their stock in the Netherlands. Straightforward, day 4, exactly as quoted.
Their raw material tested 98.3% against a reseller vial of nominally the same compound at 98.2%. Going direct is the whole argument.
Good communication throughout, accurate lead time, and the parcel arrived on day 4.
Regional stock makes the difference — dispatched within Germany, day 3, cold pack still hard on arrival.
Vials wrapped individually, foam cut to fit, nothing loose in the box. Packing that has clearly been thought about.
Custom synthesis quote came back with a realistic timeline and they beat it. Purity on delivery matched the signed spec.
Asked them to hold an order until I confirmed a lot number and they did, without fuss and without a restocking charge.
First order, deliberately small, thymosin alpha-1 5 mg only. Documentation, transit and a Janoshik result at 99.5% all checked out, so the next one will not be small.
Reconstituted the semax 10 mg and it went clear on contact — no haze, no floaters, no long swirl. Tells you the lyophilisation was done properly.
Submitted the BPC-157 5 mg to VendorInvestigate blind, without telling them the source. 99.3% against a stated 98.9%. The number holds up when nobody knows whose vial it is.
Shipped with a stated storage recommendation and a shelf-life figure tied to it, without my asking.
Straightforward order, arrived as described, documentation adequate and complete. Nothing to add, which is the point.
Shipped from their warehouse in the United Kingdom, arrived day 5, documentation complete.
Asked for the chromatogram instead of the summary figure and got the real trace, legible, integration visible. They send it without hesitating.
Held locally in Germany, so the glutathione 600 mg arrived on day 4 without an import step.
Consistent rather than flashy. Everything lands in the high nineties, and it lands there every time.
Everything about the order was routine in the best sense — quoted 4 days, arrived in 3.
Fair pricing for the documentation standard, and delivery landed on day 4 as quoted.
Where SGN sells
Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. sells from its own storefront. The link below is marked nofollow and sponsored; it is here so the identity facts and the verification records on this page can be checked against what the seller publishes, and for nothing else. This site is paid nothing for it.
Whatever a storefront claims, the lot on the vial has to match the lot on the certificate. That check is yours and nobody else can do it for you.
Discussed in
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Coming back to: Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not
Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…
|
+45 | 50 | 39k | 20mo |
|
Follow-up: Reporting a discrepancy without making an allegation
Reporting a discrepancy without making an allegation Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…
|
2 | 24k | 19mo | |
|
The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there — what changed since
The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there — what changed since Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Structured report rather than an…
|
+29 | 35 | 6.6k | 13mo |
|
Second pass at: A payment that went through twice: how it was resolved
On the subject in the title: Second pass at: A payment that went through twice: how it was resolved Working notes rather than a conclusion. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better than…
|
2 | 1.1k | 14mo | |
|
Consistent declarations and why they matter more than clever ones
Consistent declarations and why they matter more than clever ones — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better than…
|
+146 | 164 | 2k | 17mo |
|
Documenting a supplier's response to a discrepancy
On the subject in the title: Documenting a supplier's response to a discrepancy Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the maintainers asked…
|
+44 | 49 | 589 | 8h |
Maintenance
Maintainers: KLindqvist, v.szabo. Next review due 2 December 2026.
To add a record, file a structured report in vendor reports with the compound, lot, service, method and result. Reports missing any of those are moved to the discussion rather than the record. Allegations without documentation are hidden under R6 and the hiding is logged.
On what each service's report establishes: Janoshik Analytical · Medutest · PeptideMeter · VendorInvestigate