The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question

This is a generated summary. It shows the 9 most-liked posts from a topic of 133, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
JL
j.lokkenTL2 Moderator20 Feb 2026#4

This follows post #2 rather than contradicting it.

Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.

29 likes 5mo
HE
h.eriksenTL2 Moderator11 Mar 2026#14
k.bettencourt, post #9: Critical appraisal template: (1) What did the trial set out to estimate? (2) Could the design answer that question? (3) Was the population sufficiently similar to your population to apply the results? (4) What was the absolute effect, not just the relative one? (5) What are the two strongest criticisms available? Go to post

Coming back to post #12, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

PIONEER 6 (N Engl J Med 2019): Cardiovascular safety trial for oral semaglutide, not efficacy. Non-inferiority for safety was met. The trial was not designed to establish benefit, though point estimates favoured the drug.

31 likes in reply to #9 5mo
NG
np_gilmoreTL3Nurse practitioner21 Mar 2026#21

SOUL (N Engl J Med 2025): Oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes. Extends the cardiovascular evidence to the oral formulation. Note that oral bioavailability is lower and more variable than injectable.

31 likes 4mo
AK
a.kwiatkowskiTL2Member21 Apr 2026#44

SURMOUNT-1 (N Engl J Med 2022): Tirzepatide obesity trial. The largest mean weight reduction for a pharmacological intervention at publication. Read the categorical thresholds carefully — they can exaggerate separation.

29 likes 3mo
SG
s.grimaldiTL2 Moderator5 May 2026#55

Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.

29 likes 3mo
ID
i.dumitruTL2 Moderator17 May 2026#66
IRenaudin, post #46: This follows post #43 rather than contradicting it. Critical appraisal template: (1) What did the trial set out to estimate? (2) Could the design answer that question? (3) Was the population sufficiently similar to your population to apply the results? (4) What was the absolute effect, not just the relative one? (5) What are the two… Go to post

PIONEER 6 (N Engl J Med 2019): Cardiovascular safety trial for oral semaglutide, not efficacy. Non-inferiority for safety was met. The trial was not designed to establish benefit, though point estimates favoured the drug.

33 likes in reply to #46 2mo
FA
f.amankwahTL2 Moderator16 Jun 2026#93

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

31 likes 1mo
CB
c.boatengTL2 Moderator27 Jun 2026#104

TRIUMPH (ongoing): Retatrutide phase 3. No results yet. Nothing should be attributed to it because it has not finished. When it does, this discussion will return to it.

31 likes 30d
MN
m.ndiayeTL2 Moderator16 Jul 2026#122

SOUL (N Engl J Med 2025): Oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes. Extends the cardiovascular evidence to the oral formulation. Note that oral bioavailability is lower and more variable than injectable.

29 likes 12d

Read the full topic (133 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-1, read without the press release
On the subject in the title: Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-1, read without the press release Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before…
PPKFAALMDN+54 62 1.5k 26d
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SURPASS-2 ( N…
BZNEMETLM+45 50 3k 9mo
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials — what changed since
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it…
OVFVIISLJB+14 18 35k 8mo
Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints — does this still hold?
Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Comparing STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med ,…
BDBEMVD 3 28k 6mo
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Comparing STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021) with SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024) and…
MDAWRMJDVR+118 132 12k 15mo

Related topics — sharing the tags journal club, estimand, randomised trial

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Journal club: STEP 4 and what a withdrawal design can prove — one year on
Journal club: STEP 4 and what a withdrawal design can prove — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med , 2024).…
TDSVOFSOCT+56 62 34k 15mo
Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere — one year on
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere — one year on Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it…
DBHCNRKKI+92 97 3.6k 20h
Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) with SURMOUNT-2 (…
MDSRSGSLSC+24 28 17k 15h
Journal club: is percentage weight change the right endpoint?
Journal club: is percentage weight change the right endpoint? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Comparing SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) with SURMOUNT-OSA (…
IFLEDSSBE+116 120 23k 3mo
Second pass at: Semaglutide and alcohol: what is actually documented
Second pass at: Semaglutide and alcohol: what is actually documented Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in…
IBDNOFID+15 19 4.4k 13mo