SELECT (N Engl J Med 2023): Semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes without diabetes. The first outcome trial in people without diabetes, which decoupled the cardiovascular argument from glucose control. Read the absolute numbers, not just the relative reduction.
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold?
This follows post #51 rather than contradicting it.
SURMOUNT-1 (N Engl J Med 2022): Tirzepatide obesity trial. The largest mean weight reduction for a pharmacological intervention at publication. Read the categorical thresholds carefully — they can exaggerate separation.
STEP 1 (N Engl J Med 2021): The pivotal obesity trial for semaglutide and the reference point for most subsequent comparison. Mean weight reduction was substantially larger than anything previously achieved pharmacologically.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Critical appraisal template: (1) What did the trial set out to estimate? (2) Could the design answer that question? (3) Was the population sufficiently similar to your population to apply the results? (4) What was the absolute effect, not just the relative one? (5) What are the two strongest criticisms available?
I read post #112 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
SURMOUNT-1 (N Engl J Med 2022): Tirzepatide obesity trial. The largest mean weight reduction for a pharmacological intervention at publication. Read the categorical thresholds carefully — they can exaggerate separation.
STEP 1 (N Engl J Med 2021): The pivotal obesity trial for semaglutide and the reference point for most subsequent comparison. Mean weight reduction was substantially larger than anything previously achieved pharmacologically.
Read the full topic (133 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimandEvidence › Journal club · 3 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up: Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper
On the subject in the title: Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) cited in support of a claim I do not…
|
+20 | 24 | 8.7k | 16mo |
|
[2026 update] Journal club: is percentage weight change the right endpoint?
Journal club: is percentage weight change the right endpoint? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Comparing SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) with…
|
+105 | 118 | 18k | 11mo |
|
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016)…
|
+122 | 131 | 5.2k | just now |
|
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials
On the subject in the title: Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before…
|
2 | 1.9k | 12mo | |
|
Second pass at: Journal club: STEP 4 and what a withdrawal design can prove
Second pass at: Journal club: STEP 4 and what a withdrawal design can prove Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med ,…
|
+81 | 90 | 54k | 9mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags risk of bias, number needed to treat, randomised trial
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The 2.5 mg starting dose is not a therapeutic dose — why that matters — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: The 2.5 mg starting dose is not a therapeutic dose — why that matters — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: STEP 8 ( JAMA ,…
|
+12 | 16 | 11k | 7mo |
|
Revisiting: How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work
Revisiting: How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in…
|
+31 | 35 | 7k | 1d |
|
Reading a combination trial: attributing effect to components
On the subject in the title: Reading a combination trial: attributing effect to components Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before…
|
4 | 19k | 11mo | |
|
Follow-up: Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024). Please read it…
|
+80 | 91 | 10k | 11mo |
|
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials — what changed since
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it…
|
+14 | 18 | 35k | 8mo |