The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold?

This is a generated summary. It shows the 9 most-liked posts from a topic of 133, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
CC
c.cardosoTL2 Moderator17 Apr 2025#9
v.rautio, post #5: SURMOUNT-OSA (N Engl J Med 2024): Tirzepatide in obstructive sleep apnoea, using an objective physiological endpoint. Notable because soft endpoints are avoided. Two parallel trials addressed the confounder directly. Go to post

SELECT (N Engl J Med 2023): Semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes without diabetes. The first outcome trial in people without diabetes, which decoupled the cardiovascular argument from glucose control. Read the absolute numbers, not just the relative reduction.

31 likes in reply to #5 15mo
YM
y.mensahTL3Wiki editor17 Apr 2025#19

FLOW (N Engl J Med 2024): Semaglutide renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Stopped early for efficacy. Component-by-component analysis is essential because the components differ in how patient-important they are.

27 likes 15mo
SC
s.chowdhuryTL3Regular19 Apr 2025#54

This follows post #51 rather than contradicting it.

SURMOUNT-1 (N Engl J Med 2022): Tirzepatide obesity trial. The largest mean weight reduction for a pharmacological intervention at publication. Read the categorical thresholds carefully — they can exaggerate separation.

33 likes 15mo
AH
a.hartmannTL2 Moderator20 Apr 2025#66

STEP 1 (N Engl J Med 2021): The pivotal obesity trial for semaglutide and the reference point for most subsequent comparison. Mean weight reduction was substantially larger than anything previously achieved pharmacologically.

31 likes 15mo
EV
e.verhoevenTL2 Moderator20 Apr 2025#72
tracked_parcel, post #48: FLOW (N Engl J Med 2024): Semaglutide renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Stopped early for efficacy. Component-by-component analysis is essential because the components differ in how patient-important they are. Go to post

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

28 likes in reply to #48 15mo
RM
r.mensaTL2 Moderator21 Apr 2025#79

SURMOUNT-1 (N Engl J Med 2022): Tirzepatide obesity trial. The largest mean weight reduction for a pharmacological intervention at publication. Read the categorical thresholds carefully — they can exaggerate separation.

29 likes 15mo
MA
m.agyemanTL2 Moderator21 Apr 2025#85

Critical appraisal template: (1) What did the trial set out to estimate? (2) Could the design answer that question? (3) Was the population sufficiently similar to your population to apply the results? (4) What was the absolute effect, not just the relative one? (5) What are the two strongest criticisms available?

28 likes 15mo
TF
taper_fileTL3Regular22 Apr 2025#114

I read post #112 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

SURMOUNT-1 (N Engl J Med 2022): Tirzepatide obesity trial. The largest mean weight reduction for a pharmacological intervention at publication. Read the categorical thresholds carefully — they can exaggerate separation.

32 likes 15mo
LM
lyophil_marginTL3Regular23 Apr 2025#127
f.haddad, post #41: This follows post #38 rather than contradicting it. For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use. Go to post

STEP 1 (N Engl J Med 2021): The pivotal obesity trial for semaglutide and the reference point for most subsequent comparison. Mean weight reduction was substantially larger than anything previously achieved pharmacologically.

30 likes in reply to #41 15mo

Read the full topic (133 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Follow-up: Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper
On the subject in the title: Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) cited in support of a claim I do not…
NDNRRRSIS+20 24 8.7k 16mo
[2026 update] Journal club: is percentage weight change the right endpoint?
Journal club: is percentage weight change the right endpoint? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Comparing SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) with…
MLSCNHHRS+105 118 18k 11mo
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016)…
BPTTARNSET+122 131 5.2k just now
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials
On the subject in the title: Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before…
LSCLPM 2 1.9k 12mo
Second pass at: Journal club: STEP 4 and what a withdrawal design can prove
Second pass at: Journal club: STEP 4 and what a withdrawal design can prove Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med ,…
AWFLAWCFZL+81 90 54k 9mo

Related topics — sharing the tags risk of bias, number needed to treat, randomised trial

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
The 2.5 mg starting dose is not a therapeutic dose — why that matters — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: The 2.5 mg starting dose is not a therapeutic dose — why that matters — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: STEP 8 ( JAMA ,…
FBSERSGRI+12 16 11k 7mo
Revisiting: How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work
Revisiting: How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in…
VBNKEARSI+31 35 7k 1d
Reading a combination trial: attributing effect to components
On the subject in the title: Reading a combination trial: attributing effect to components Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before…
VMAHTTSVP 4 19k 11mo
Follow-up: Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024). Please read it…
DPSGRIEDMB+80 91 10k 11mo
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials — what changed since
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it…
OVFVIISLJB+14 18 35k 8mo