The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Journal club: STEP 3 and the intensive behavioural therapy floor

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 11, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
LS
l.solbergTL2 Moderator11 Oct 2025#1

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: STEP 3 and the intensive behavioural therapy floor Everything below is what sits behind that.

Comparing SCALE (N Engl J Med, 2015) with STEP 4 (JAMA, 2021) and finding the comparison harder than it looks.

Different populations, different durations, different endpoints defined slightly differently, and in one case a different estimand. People compare the headline percentages anyway, including me until recently.

Is there a defensible way to put these side by side, or is the honest answer that there is not and we should stop?

38 likes 10mo
CL
c.lundgrenTL2 Moderator16 Feb 2026#5
dr_okonkwo, post #2: Critical appraisal template: (1) What did the trial set out to estimate? (2) Could the design answer that question? (3) Was the population sufficiently similar to your population to apply the results? (4) What was the absolute effect, not just the relative one? (5) What are the two strongest criticisms available? Go to post

SOUL (N Engl J Med 2025): Oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes. Extends the cardiovascular evidence to the oral formulation. Note that oral bioavailability is lower and more variable than injectable.

27 likes in reply to #2 5mo
CC
c.cardosoTL2 Moderator27 Apr 2026#8
dr_okonkwo, post #2: Critical appraisal template: (1) What did the trial set out to estimate? (2) Could the design answer that question? (3) Was the population sufficiently similar to your population to apply the results? (4) What was the absolute effect, not just the relative one? (5) What are the two strongest criticisms available? Go to post

Coming back to post #6, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

TRIUMPH (ongoing): Retatrutide phase 3. No results yet. Nothing should be attributed to it because it has not finished. When it does, this discussion will return to it.

13 likes in reply to #2 3mo
CL
customs_ledgerTL3Regular9 Jun 2026 · edited#10

Worth separating two things that post #6 runs together.

SURMOUNT-1 (N Engl J Med 2022): Tirzepatide obesity trial. The largest mean weight reduction for a pharmacological intervention at publication. Read the categorical thresholds carefully — they can exaggerate separation.

21 likes 2mo
DA
d.achebeTL2 Moderator30 Jun 2026#11
PharmNotes_Whitfield, post #4: STEP 1 (N Engl J Med 2021): The pivotal obesity trial for semaglutide and the reference point for most subsequent comparison. Mean weight reduction was substantially larger than anything previously achieved pharmacologically. Go to post

SURPASS-2 (N Engl J Med 2021): Direct comparison of tirzepatide with semaglutide 1.0 mg. The 1.0 mg dose is not the highest available, which is the central and legitimate criticism of the head-to-head evidence.

17 likes in reply to #4 28d

Read the full topic (11 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper
Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
LFVDAERASV+7 11 33k 7mo
Journal club: STEP-HFpEF and symptom endpoints
Journal club: STEP-HFpEF and symptom endpoints — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) and finding…
MREPAKTWJD+18 22 2.5k 11mo
About the Journal club category
Our recurring session. One named paper per topic, methods first, conclusions last. Everyone reads before posting. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every…
KHSDEMSCA+2 6 12k 16mo
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) with STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022)…
ZNBSRTW 3 11k 9h
Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024) with SCALE ( N Engl J…
CIRCBPMN+47 51 617 16mo

Related topics — sharing the tags randomised trial, journal club, effect size

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
What I would record differently if I started again
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What I would record differently if I started again Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes about. I have…
MICLVK 2 12k 5mo
A well-designed study with a badly written abstract
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A well-designed study with a badly written abstract Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) with LEADER ( N Engl J Med ,…
RCMICBMRPN+117 128 7.2k 14mo
Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints — does this still hold?
Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Comparing STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med ,…
BDBEMVD 3 28k 6mo
Measurement error in home scales, with a worked standard deviation — a second dataset
Measurement error in home scales, with a worked standard deviation — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) with SURPASS-2…
AKKSA 2 13k 7mo
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials
On the subject in the title: Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before…
LSCLPM 2 1.9k 12mo