Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously — a second dataset posts 61–67
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
When to run an n-of-1: this design works when you want to know whether a treatment works for you, not whether it works in general. For that purpose, it is efficient.
Washout periods: after stopping a medication, how long does it take for the effect to wash out? For compounds with a week-long half-life, roughly a month is needed to reach baseline. Using that washout period in a before-after design strengthens the inference.
Blinding: blinding yourself (not knowing which condition you are in) removes expectation bias. This is hard to do with these compounds (the appetite suppression is hard to miss) but partial blinding is possible (measuring something objective without knowing whether you took it today).
This topic was referenced in
- Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmeticResearch Methods › N-of-1 designs · 96 replies
- Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind — one year onResearch Methods › N-of-1 designs · 80 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) with SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) and finding the…
|
+96 | 119 | 58k | 14mo |
|
Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine
Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I have seen SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in…
|
2 | 46k | 11mo | |
|
Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022). Please read it before…
|
+2 | 6 | 695 | 6mo |
|
Coming back to: Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine
The question in the title: Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Comparing LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) with…
|
+56 | 62 | 11k | 4mo |
|
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits
On the subject in the title: Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019) with STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) and finding the…
|
+40 | 44 | 33k | 5d |
Related topics — sharing the tags data table, worked example, confounding
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A calculator that gives a right answer to the wrong question
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A calculator that gives a right answer to the wrong question Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
|
+32 | 36 | 1.9k | 17h |
|
A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. I have read the maintained page on this and I…
|
+86 | 93 | 25k | 13mo |
|
Coming back to: Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide
On the subject in the title: Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
2 | 43k | 16mo | |
|
Peak-to-trough ratio at steady state for a weekly agent
On the subject in the title: Peak-to-trough ratio at steady state for a weekly agent Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere. A…
|
+58 | 64 | 9.7k | 2mo |
|
Measurement error in home scales, with a worked standard deviation — the long version
On the subject in the title: Measurement error in home scales, with a worked standard deviation — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022).…
|
+96 | 105 | 2k | 2mo |