The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number

This is a generated summary. It shows the 9 most-liked posts from a topic of 114, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
CB
c.balogunTL2 Moderator12 Mar 2025#27

What mass accuracy establishes: the measured mass is consistent with a specific composition. What it does not establish: purity, sequence order, stereochemistry, or the absence of an isobaric species. Every one of those requires something else.

30 likes 17mo
TF
taper_fileTL3Regular25 Mar 2025#37
j.habermann, post #22: Worth separating two things that post #18 runs together. Purity and identity are different questions: LC-MS establishes that the species at a retention time has the expected mass. It does not establish how much of the sample is that species (that is what LC-UV purity answers). Go to post

Worth separating two things that post #33 runs together.

Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.

28 likes in reply to #22 16mo
GI
g.ibarraTL2 Moderator25 Apr 2025#62

Resolution: "high resolution" commonly means <5 ppm across the mass range. Unit-resolution instruments achieve ±1 Da at best and cannot distinguish two species differing by less than 1 Da in total mass.

31 likes 15mo
IO
i.oseiTL2 Moderator3 May 2025#69

post #68 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Electrospray ionisation produces multiply charged ions. For a 4 kDa peptide you expect mostly 2+, 3+, and 4+ charge states. Reading an electrospray spectrum means recognizing the envelope, not looking for one peak.

30 likes 15mo
PM
p.mwangiTL2 Moderator9 May 2025#74
d.achebe, post #47: Sample matrix effects: if a sample is dissolved in a complex matrix, other compounds in the matrix can suppress the peptide signal. Clean samples give higher sensitivity than dirty samples. Go to post

post #73 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Calibration matters: a high-resolution instrument out of calibration can report mass with ppm error large enough to be uninformative. Check when the instrument was last calibrated before trusting the reported accuracy.

30 likes in reply to #47 15mo
HF
h.falkTL2 Moderator17 May 2025 · edited#81

Calibration matters: a high-resolution instrument out of calibration can report mass with ppm error large enough to be uninformative. Check when the instrument was last calibrated before trusting the reported accuracy.

28 likes 14mo
CW
c.wijnbergTL2Member27 May 2025#90

Quantitation by MS: most quantitation is done by LC-UV detection at 214 nm, not by MS, because extinction coefficients are better known. MS can quantify if an internal standard is used but that requires preparation.

29 likes 14mo
EM
e.mwangiTL2 Moderator8 Jun 2025#102
dr_seong, post #73: Worth separating two things that post #69 runs together. Common adducts: sodium adds ≈22, potassium adds ≈38 compared to hydrogen. A [M+Na]+ peak is common and its mass is predictable from the base mass. Go to post

Picking up post #99: that is the part I would want checked first.

Resolution: "high resolution" commonly means <5 ppm across the mass range. Unit-resolution instruments achieve ±1 Da at best and cannot distinguish two species differing by less than 1 Da in total mass.

28 likes in reply to #73 14mo
D
DKwiatkowskiTL3Regular18 Jun 2025#111

post #110 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Tandem mass spectrometry: MS/MS fragments the molecular ion and uses fragment masses to confirm identity and detect modifications. A simple identity confirmation by LC-MS does not address post-translational modifications or impurities with the same or very close mass.

31 likes 13mo

Read the full topic (114 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Coming back to: Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated
Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. retatrutide has a…
HFSLADAKTI+34 38 4.8k 10mo
Coming back to: Deconvolution of a multiply charged envelope
On the subject in the title: Deconvolution of a multiply charged envelope Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. tirzepatide has a…
VRCVEL 2 12k 22mo
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
RMLSMHMINM+121 129 25k 17mo
What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not
What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
JVBPSOOAK+56 60 5.2k 9mo
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone — the long version
On the subject in the title: Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
TFVKPFIDLF+38 44 60k 11mo

Related topics — sharing the tags counter-ion content, mass error (ppm), charge states

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
About the Mass spectrometry category
LC-MS and high-resolution MS, charge states, mass accuracy in ppm, and what identity confirmation does and does not establish. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it,…
DOOBLDBDRV+5 9 19k 6h
Residual solvents and scavengers: what is looked for
On the subject in the title: Residual solvents and scavengers: what is looked for Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise…
DOEVABKPLG+19 23 39k 14mo
Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely
Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
RVIDSSVKFP+61 69 2.9k 6mo
Follow-up: Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences
On the subject in the title: Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
AVABAZDTRG+12 16 5.7k 21mo
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
SHOWM 2 15k 18mo