The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Compounds · Cagrilintide & amylin analogues · continued

The CagriSema phase 2 paper and what a fixed combination buys posts 91–94

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

DB
d.bramleyTL3Regular31 Aug 2025 · edited#91
cannula_drift, post #42: Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing. The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough. Go to post

I read post #89 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Historical amylin analogues: pramlintide was the only long-acting amylin analogue licensed for some time and its poor adherence was a known limitation. A weekly formulation addresses that practical barrier.

22 likes in reply to #42 11mo
AN
a.nascimentoTL2 Moderator2 Sep 2025#92

Cagrilintide molecular characteristics: it is a synthetic amylin analogue, substituted to prevent the amyloidogenicity of human amylin. The sequence is short and analytically straightforward to confirm by LC-MS.

10 likes 11mo
KB
k.brandl_deTL3Translator · DE4 Sep 2025#93

Nausea profile of amylin analogues: the historical agent pramlintide required multiple daily doses and had a difficult tolerability profile. A weekly formulation is a substantially different proposition and data from that is more relevant than data from pramlintide.

3 likes 11mo
AT
a.teixeiraTL2 Moderator6 Sep 2025#94
b.vestergaard, post #74: I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological. The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient. Go to post

post #93 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.

0 likes in reply to #74 11mo

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
The CagriSema phase 2 paper and what a fixed combination buys — the long version
The CagriSema phase 2 paper and what a fixed combination buys — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021)…
LCJMTPSBCR+137 158 17k 13mo
Nausea profile of amylin analogues compared with GLP-1 agonists
Nausea profile of amylin analogues compared with GLP-1 agonists Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it…
CRIGELZAG+70 76 3k 4mo
[2026 update] Amylin and gastric emptying: overlapping mechanisms with incretins
Amylin and gastric emptying: overlapping mechanisms with incretins — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024). Please read it before…
BTRHAAMYE+21 25 44k 5mo
Coming back to: Amylin analogue mechanism: satiety signalling separate from GLP-1
On the subject in the title: Amylin analogue mechanism: satiety signalling separate from GLP-1 Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) cited in support of a claim I…
IDNMTNAFMB+27 31 671 12mo
Historical amylin analogues and what happened to them
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Historical amylin analogues and what happened to them Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in support of a…
OFEIDVSGAR+29 36 31k 1d

Related topics — sharing the tags randomised trial, cagrilintide, effect size

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
The most common factual error about semaglutide on the internet — what changed since
The most common factual error about semaglutide on the internet — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with STEP 1 ( N…
SKBOSBBDAL+42 46 1.7k 5mo
Regression to the mean in progress reports
On the subject in the title: Regression to the mean in progress reports Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before posting; the discussion…
HAAMTFAVDM+30 34 49k 12mo
Criticising the method without criticising the authors — one year on
On the subject in the title: Criticising the method without criticising the authors — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before posting;…
KOSKJNAKSC+16 20 61k 11mo
Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully Everything below is what sits behind that. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that…
PGFCVWZV+86 92 54k 7mo
The CagriSema phase 2 paper and what a fixed combination buys — the long version
The CagriSema phase 2 paper and what a fixed combination buys — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021)…
LCJMTPSBCR+137 158 17k 13mo